If one considers the industry of psychiatric drugs, it appears to me that the whole industry is mainly a State and Insurance companies driven (with varying degrees between these two entities) Medical Syndicate where informal/formal social contacts within each country decide a given drug/treatment regime. In this way, as psychiatry drugs are beyond people's choice in the ordinary sense because they're primarily bought/dispensed by the clinics/doctors and hospitals that in turn are financed by states and insurance companies in unison, the whole business of psychiatric drugs are in fact driven by exactly these states and insurance companies, mediated by these informal/formal social contacts! Therefore, speculatively, poor procedure [incl. public education] and poor personnel approach, in short: corruption, accelerate the justification and use of psychiatric drugs! Who has been speaking of China? Is this any good? I don't think so!
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1418855/the-psychiatric-medicines-are-a-state-and-insurance-driven-medical-syndicate/.)
Originally posted by mr. Terje Lea with the url, http://blog.t-lea.net/#post62!
Friday, 30 September 2011
Thursday, 29 September 2011
Between Suicide and Murder!
Between Suicide and Murder!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 06:14:19
As I feel swayed between suicide, in order to avoid a gruesome death, and suspected murder, possibly from long and painful medically assisted torture, I wonder if it's possible to make a human rights case on this? I mean, for how long do I bother to tolerate the torments of cold sweating, often failing personal hygiene, in fear for my life? If some members, as routine, of society are pinpointed for this on a subcultural level, it's devious indeed and should be resolved, a blatant ethical requirement! Yet I sense psychiatry is easily muting such claims for being hysteria and "fantasy"! Can I make a case and if so, how? Please feel free to submit responses! Cheers!
(There are also these possibilities for preparing a body or forging a medical report for making the death appear "gentle" and "natural", but I guess this is a cloud on the sky!)
The title refers to Søren Kierkegaards "Fear and Trembling", although I remember, falsely or truly, that the title has been "Between Fear and Trembling" on some editions.
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1418887/between-suicide-and-murder/.)
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post79.
for 7 timer siden
Just for justifiying my own views to the formulation of "these f*cking stupid people". Also note the date: 2010-12-31 06:14:19.
for 7 timer siden
Almost as if this "Jesus Christ" mental health service "wouldn't know" of the social worker, the contact with the Police and the lawyer! _So_ I STAND WITH WHAT I'VE WRITTEN!!! THIS COUNTRY IS MESSED UP, F*CKED IN THE HEAD, LOST ITS ABILITY TO DECENTLY LEAD (ANYTHING WHATSOEVER), THE RATIONALE IS GONE!!!!! (I'm not even going to ask you to sympathise!)
for 7 timer siden
The original date on the above document may be Saturday, 11. September, 2010! From my reference, What_is_writtenN16.html. These files have been listed before under "Deletion of the Blog..."
for 6 timer siden
By the black humour on a certain subset of people: "More than London [56 incl. 4 suicide bombers], not exactly Madrid [191], but 91 in Oslo, hmmm..., you have been good, that's respectable work!"
søndag kl. 21:51
The number is now, altogether, 76 and possibly 4 missing (unknown of latest). Technical, merely, there's not more to it!
for 6 timer siden
[One comment has been removed because it adds nothing!]
for 6 timer siden
I've been forgetting. I've also written about human rights violations in Norway (activist/vigilante group nr. 9, arbitrary number really). The Norwegian title (it's in fact in Norwegian) is "Menneskerettighetsbrudd i Norge - Aksjonsgruppe 9". But I've "closed" it because I intend to "move far away" and never return (for real).
for 18 timer siden
There used to be only Amnesty Int. and myself (appx.), but after a while a bunch of websites and groups emerged! You can check yourself.
for 18 timer siden
On media (in Norway): Let's not forget media hysteria some years ago on Satanists and how it all boiled down to a young man in a woolen gray sweater. Right, that's grey, not black! But we are heavy on the metal music! Black metal, yes? Even though, for being mere signal code/social code it has been f*cking pathetic!
for 18 timer siden
And the rumours, loosely mentioned and as much as Dagbladet writes it, of child-torturers specialists and other criminals of the hardest kind who are sent abroad (from Norway and after domestic training) just to incite the most sh*t they can do and make the most havoc and human devastation they possibly can!
for 21 timer siden
Norws... (or is it the Norw-s?)
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea And you, you crazy idiot...! Shut up!!!
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea Just for some underpinning data: why do young kids at 5-10 commit suicide? How are the standards and what are the numbers and quality of systems with Childcare Services (in Norway and elsewhere) and what about the adoption services? Enjoy! And have your meal too! :-)
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea It should read: "child torturer specialists" or "child torture specialists".
for 18 timer siden · Liker
On torture: as ever there is an excellent "educative" movie by Charles Bronson by the name, The Evil That Men Do (1984). You sohuld see it. It may even be health to people as young as 16.
for 18 timer siden
For my own person, for how long am I supposed to say, under severe stress, that I'm HAPPY just so these psychological "experts" can have a "point"? Go and@££$$€€$$€$€$€$£$€$@£$@$$€€{€€{€£$$€$£££$£@@£@@ (yes, all that)!
i går kl. 17:19
Ohhh... so many currency symbols there, mr. Olsnes-Lea... Yes, if you go around there and think you can make a lot of money out of contempt and disdain... that's on YOU!!! So go ahead, you deluded f*ck and try it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i går kl. 17:25
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 06:14:19
As I feel swayed between suicide, in order to avoid a gruesome death, and suspected murder, possibly from long and painful medically assisted torture, I wonder if it's possible to make a human rights case on this? I mean, for how long do I bother to tolerate the torments of cold sweating, often failing personal hygiene, in fear for my life? If some members, as routine, of society are pinpointed for this on a subcultural level, it's devious indeed and should be resolved, a blatant ethical requirement! Yet I sense psychiatry is easily muting such claims for being hysteria and "fantasy"! Can I make a case and if so, how? Please feel free to submit responses! Cheers!
(There are also these possibilities for preparing a body or forging a medical report for making the death appear "gentle" and "natural", but I guess this is a cloud on the sky!)
The title refers to Søren Kierkegaards "Fear and Trembling", although I remember, falsely or truly, that the title has been "Between Fear and Trembling" on some editions.
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1418887/between-suicide-and-murder/.)
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post79.
for 7 timer siden
Just for justifiying my own views to the formulation of "these f*cking stupid people". Also note the date: 2010-12-31 06:14:19.
for 7 timer siden
Almost as if this "Jesus Christ" mental health service "wouldn't know" of the social worker, the contact with the Police and the lawyer! _So_ I STAND WITH WHAT I'VE WRITTEN!!! THIS COUNTRY IS MESSED UP, F*CKED IN THE HEAD, LOST ITS ABILITY TO DECENTLY LEAD (ANYTHING WHATSOEVER), THE RATIONALE IS GONE!!!!! (I'm not even going to ask you to sympathise!)
for 7 timer siden
The original date on the above document may be Saturday, 11. September, 2010! From my reference, What_is_writtenN16.html. These files have been listed before under "Deletion of the Blog..."
for 6 timer siden
By the black humour on a certain subset of people: "More than London [56 incl. 4 suicide bombers], not exactly Madrid [191], but 91 in Oslo, hmmm..., you have been good, that's respectable work!"
søndag kl. 21:51
The number is now, altogether, 76 and possibly 4 missing (unknown of latest). Technical, merely, there's not more to it!
for 6 timer siden
[One comment has been removed because it adds nothing!]
for 6 timer siden
I've been forgetting. I've also written about human rights violations in Norway (activist/vigilante group nr. 9, arbitrary number really). The Norwegian title (it's in fact in Norwegian) is "Menneskerettighetsbrudd i Norge - Aksjonsgruppe 9". But I've "closed" it because I intend to "move far away" and never return (for real).
for 18 timer siden
There used to be only Amnesty Int. and myself (appx.), but after a while a bunch of websites and groups emerged! You can check yourself.
for 18 timer siden
On media (in Norway): Let's not forget media hysteria some years ago on Satanists and how it all boiled down to a young man in a woolen gray sweater. Right, that's grey, not black! But we are heavy on the metal music! Black metal, yes? Even though, for being mere signal code/social code it has been f*cking pathetic!
for 18 timer siden
And the rumours, loosely mentioned and as much as Dagbladet writes it, of child-torturers specialists and other criminals of the hardest kind who are sent abroad (from Norway and after domestic training) just to incite the most sh*t they can do and make the most havoc and human devastation they possibly can!
for 21 timer siden
Norws... (or is it the Norw-s?)
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea And you, you crazy idiot...! Shut up!!!
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea Just for some underpinning data: why do young kids at 5-10 commit suicide? How are the standards and what are the numbers and quality of systems with Childcare Services (in Norway and elsewhere) and what about the adoption services? Enjoy! And have your meal too! :-)
for 21 timer siden · Liker
Terje Lea It should read: "child torturer specialists" or "child torture specialists".
for 18 timer siden · Liker
On torture: as ever there is an excellent "educative" movie by Charles Bronson by the name, The Evil That Men Do (1984). You sohuld see it. It may even be health to people as young as 16.
for 18 timer siden
For my own person, for how long am I supposed to say, under severe stress, that I'm HAPPY just so these psychological "experts" can have a "point"? Go and@££$$€€$$€$€$€$£$€$@£$@$$€€{€€{€£$$€$£££$£@@£@@ (yes, all that)!
i går kl. 17:19
Ohhh... so many currency symbols there, mr. Olsnes-Lea... Yes, if you go around there and think you can make a lot of money out of contempt and disdain... that's on YOU!!! So go ahead, you deluded f*ck and try it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i går kl. 17:25
Pro and Con Arguments of (Assisted) Suicide
Pro and Con Arguments of (Assisted) Suicide
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:58 pm; forum.philosophynow.org
Examination! Time for "inquisition"!
I've made this topic because I think there are some (really) disgusting or stupid arguments against (Assisted) Suicide.
First of all, those who seriously argue for the right to (Assisted) Suicide (A)S seems to have the greatest integrity of the subject they're speaking of. Necessarily, those who oppose it, are on the outside of the situation, but may very well have been considering (Assisted) Suicide in the past.
Now, one person, Simone, argues in favour:
1. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are in great pain and are bound to die (terminally ill).
2. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are losing their mind (fx. Alzheimer's).
3. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are in great mental pain/distress to which there's no hope and there's no-one willing to significantly change the situation.
4. Combination of two or more of 1., 2. and 3.
5. People should have the possibility to (A)S so that people can't be kept as virtual slaves anymore or forced to compromise on themselves to that extent.
6. People should have the possibility to (A)S so that people aren't forced to compromise on themselves to any extent (by 1., 2., 3. and 4.), calling the situation for what it is, making the possibility to (A)S possibly less restrictive.
7. There's more dignity in dying reasonably healthy and able (by/implied by X. in post #4 on the PF forum).
8. If I have no constructive role in society, being an adult, and I have the urge to commit suicide. It should be my right to commit this suicide or else I might get involved with illegal guns and homicide(s). Being an adult involves knowing what's best for yourself as you are closest to yourself and clearly then, I'm ethically/lawfully entitled to choose my destiny of suicide in my own opinion. Therefore, also, I demand it!
9. We should allow people to die by 1. and 2., possibly also by 3., 5. and 6. because it's the decent approach to the matters (by Apathy Kills in post #18 on the PF forum). There's a certain power in using the word, "decent", here and I'd like you to contemplate this.
10. The fact that people are driven down to basic instincts, into corners of despair, forced to compromise on themselves is necessarily leading to unnecessary friction and unhealthy tendencies in society. (A)S should therefore be allowed! (I think this is slightly different than 4. and 5.)
11. Acknowledging point 5. of the opposition, I do still think the defacto performance of society in telling people to "get out of the way" in a possibly hidden and cruel manner (if nothing else then implicitly by use of threats and fear) is true whether this is unexpressed or not (because I can think of such thought as having existence, plausibly).
(It should be noted that assisted suicides if they become legal, always are qualified (by whatever requirements), assisted suicides. This is implicit, but now it's explicit!)
One person, Peter, argues against:
1. People should not have the possibility to die, (A)S, because of (my) (presumably) view of the sanctity of life.
2. People should not have the possibility to die, (A)S, because (unfounded) "it's the wrong signal to give".
3. In the case of older people, they may (mis-) perceive their burden on family and friends in an unproportionate way and thus wrongly requesting, wanting or actually committing suicide.
4. There simply is no unbearable/painful situation and therefore all suicides are wrong.
5. By allowing people suicide, one may give a (possibly subtle) signal that people should "get out of the way" and consequently devalue the human life. Therefore, suicide should not be legal. (This may likely be the real argument of 2. while 2. is just a "social" signal of ambiguity.)
6. By denying people (assisted) suicide, one (unfounded) prevents possibly a number of suicides. Therefore, suicide should not be legal. (By atightropewalker in post #47.)
(Note. If one allows one suicide, it doesn't necessarily mean that you allow one more suicide. It can be that one "palliative" assisted suicide is prevented or that one actual suicide is prevented. Either way, assisted suicides can't be said to necessarily have a bearing on the total number of suicides, actual or possible.)
It seems to me to be common to somehow discredit the person who wants to commit suicide by being in doubt of the person's intelligence, sanity or cognition of circumstances.
I'd like you to add arguments to either of these two people. I'd also like you to list possible hidden motives with either of these two persons.
Like this:
Hidden, Peter, "I like the fact that people die in severe pain and I also like the melancholy of thinking so."
Hidden, Peter, "I like the fact that people go through great pains before getting finally getting it done in all sorts of funny ways. Heck, it's a jungle out there and I'm an explorer!"
Hidden, Peter, "If we give people the possibility to (A)S, people can't be kept as virtual slaves anymore or forced to compromise on themselves to that extent."
Consequently, I also like you to note the possibilities of Simone having hidden motives and the very nature of them.
PS: I also note that the President of the Norwegian Doctor's Association is against (A)S and that other doctors (tossing in the "authority" and "status") also are usually in favour, citing Hippocratic Oath. This is in no way anything objectional and one is entitled the view, but still... (and silent waters run deep).
PS2: If I, by this, get to inform people and also get to sway opinion into being in favour of (A)S, taking the correct (ethical) view on the issue according to myself, I'll be a very happy person!
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:26 pm; forum.philosophynow.org
I also like to point out the usual ordeal of suicides. You know, people sobbing and complaining about losing someone beloved, but where are the f**king stories of these (deprived) people who commit suicides? Am I supposed to think they killed themselves because of some illusion? Hah, no way! If I'm supposed to think about suicide, it's the freaking last thing, I think about! I think it's so bloody clear, but people just shut up out of politeness or something. Psychiatry should have rife possibilities on telling people what kind of conditions that drive people into suicide, but do they? F**king never!
Objectively, every possible argument in the discussion of (A)S will take effect and thus be effectuated or denied.
You may find this interesting: "Autopsy of a Suicidal Mind
Edwin S. Shneidman, Ph.D., 2004, Oxford University Press.
Autopsy of a Suicidal Mind is a uniquely intensive psychological analysis of a suicidal mind. In this poignant scientific study, the author assembles an extraordinary cast of eight renowned experts to analyze the suicidal materials, including a ten-page suicide note, given to him by a distraught mother looking for insights into her son's tragic death. Each of the eight experts offers a unique perspective and the sum of their conclusions constitutes an extraordinary psychological autopsy. This book is the first of its kind and a remarkable contribution to the study of suicide." I note that this is from 2004 (why not 1985?).
Important:
People may say that they don't subscribe to all or some of the points or that they certainly not subscribe to the hidden motives (of some people). Their very subscription may very well be so, but this doesn't undercut the fact that their position may support it, objectively! Undeniably then, every possible argument in the discussion of (A)S will take part and thus be effectuated or denied. It should on the other hand, incline them to take part in the debate of preventing this kind of vicious thinking or act in different ways to prevent suicide altogether. Clearly, they will fail to prevent the possibility of such attitudes and I think the massive problem of suicide and its origins are too great to make any solid impact on the matter by practical action. Surely then, this impels a certain kind of dissemination of information. Has Simone won?
By examining the reasons for suicide, it can become a right to commit suicide. Open discussions will decide the laws in the various legislative domains/states and nations. This right can be qualified by fulfilling a set of requirements. I also think if people have a real chance to commit suicide legally, they will embark on a different procedure in relation to family and friends. There's also a chance that family and friends will care more and be more alert to factors leading to suicidal tendencies and the whole debate may also take on better characteristics.
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:14 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
Following the pattern of abortion that must be said to be very successful if you look closely on the statistics (leading to more: well being of kids, quality time, time for attention and love and so on), excluding, of course, the Christian conservatives (for them, we go the Hell all the same), I think this can turn out well for legalised (assisted) suicides too, that it gets accepted among the greater parts of the population, that for some, suicide by medicines is a good solution to sickness and other. There's nothing in the way for the possibility that near, dear people can take part in one's departure from life. The very (A)S can represent dignity in many ways, not to say fill many empty spaces (to make society "complete").
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:24 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
I think legalising suicide has the capacity to slash the "doctors'" vile, perverse, gruesome "games" quite heavily to put it bluntly (despite their, the medical doctors, Hippocratic oath)!
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:28 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
The final death to the Con-side of legalising (assisted) suicide:
The Hippocratic Oath poses in NO way any more charity toward anti-suicide than the charity of those who are in favour because both sides may equally say that they support the best humanity and the best dignity of it.
Thus, the mere uttering of a certain "devotion" to dignity is no point as such! Therefore, "I claim to follow the Hippocratic Oath" is just a blow in the air in this sense/relation!
First published by Terje Lea and Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea as "Issues from the Internet"!
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:58 pm; forum.philosophynow.org
Examination! Time for "inquisition"!
I've made this topic because I think there are some (really) disgusting or stupid arguments against (Assisted) Suicide.
First of all, those who seriously argue for the right to (Assisted) Suicide (A)S seems to have the greatest integrity of the subject they're speaking of. Necessarily, those who oppose it, are on the outside of the situation, but may very well have been considering (Assisted) Suicide in the past.
Now, one person, Simone, argues in favour:
1. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are in great pain and are bound to die (terminally ill).
2. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are losing their mind (fx. Alzheimer's).
3. People like to have the possibility to die, (A)S, if they are in great mental pain/distress to which there's no hope and there's no-one willing to significantly change the situation.
4. Combination of two or more of 1., 2. and 3.
5. People should have the possibility to (A)S so that people can't be kept as virtual slaves anymore or forced to compromise on themselves to that extent.
6. People should have the possibility to (A)S so that people aren't forced to compromise on themselves to any extent (by 1., 2., 3. and 4.), calling the situation for what it is, making the possibility to (A)S possibly less restrictive.
7. There's more dignity in dying reasonably healthy and able (by/implied by X. in post #4 on the PF forum).
8. If I have no constructive role in society, being an adult, and I have the urge to commit suicide. It should be my right to commit this suicide or else I might get involved with illegal guns and homicide(s). Being an adult involves knowing what's best for yourself as you are closest to yourself and clearly then, I'm ethically/lawfully entitled to choose my destiny of suicide in my own opinion. Therefore, also, I demand it!
9. We should allow people to die by 1. and 2., possibly also by 3., 5. and 6. because it's the decent approach to the matters (by Apathy Kills in post #18 on the PF forum). There's a certain power in using the word, "decent", here and I'd like you to contemplate this.
10. The fact that people are driven down to basic instincts, into corners of despair, forced to compromise on themselves is necessarily leading to unnecessary friction and unhealthy tendencies in society. (A)S should therefore be allowed! (I think this is slightly different than 4. and 5.)
11. Acknowledging point 5. of the opposition, I do still think the defacto performance of society in telling people to "get out of the way" in a possibly hidden and cruel manner (if nothing else then implicitly by use of threats and fear) is true whether this is unexpressed or not (because I can think of such thought as having existence, plausibly).
(It should be noted that assisted suicides if they become legal, always are qualified (by whatever requirements), assisted suicides. This is implicit, but now it's explicit!)
One person, Peter, argues against:
1. People should not have the possibility to die, (A)S, because of (my) (presumably) view of the sanctity of life.
2. People should not have the possibility to die, (A)S, because (unfounded) "it's the wrong signal to give".
3. In the case of older people, they may (mis-) perceive their burden on family and friends in an unproportionate way and thus wrongly requesting, wanting or actually committing suicide.
4. There simply is no unbearable/painful situation and therefore all suicides are wrong.
5. By allowing people suicide, one may give a (possibly subtle) signal that people should "get out of the way" and consequently devalue the human life. Therefore, suicide should not be legal. (This may likely be the real argument of 2. while 2. is just a "social" signal of ambiguity.)
6. By denying people (assisted) suicide, one (unfounded) prevents possibly a number of suicides. Therefore, suicide should not be legal. (By atightropewalker in post #47.)
(Note. If one allows one suicide, it doesn't necessarily mean that you allow one more suicide. It can be that one "palliative" assisted suicide is prevented or that one actual suicide is prevented. Either way, assisted suicides can't be said to necessarily have a bearing on the total number of suicides, actual or possible.)
It seems to me to be common to somehow discredit the person who wants to commit suicide by being in doubt of the person's intelligence, sanity or cognition of circumstances.
I'd like you to add arguments to either of these two people. I'd also like you to list possible hidden motives with either of these two persons.
Like this:
Hidden, Peter, "I like the fact that people die in severe pain and I also like the melancholy of thinking so."
Hidden, Peter, "I like the fact that people go through great pains before getting finally getting it done in all sorts of funny ways. Heck, it's a jungle out there and I'm an explorer!"
Hidden, Peter, "If we give people the possibility to (A)S, people can't be kept as virtual slaves anymore or forced to compromise on themselves to that extent."
Consequently, I also like you to note the possibilities of Simone having hidden motives and the very nature of them.
PS: I also note that the President of the Norwegian Doctor's Association is against (A)S and that other doctors (tossing in the "authority" and "status") also are usually in favour, citing Hippocratic Oath. This is in no way anything objectional and one is entitled the view, but still... (and silent waters run deep).
PS2: If I, by this, get to inform people and also get to sway opinion into being in favour of (A)S, taking the correct (ethical) view on the issue according to myself, I'll be a very happy person!
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:26 pm; forum.philosophynow.org
I also like to point out the usual ordeal of suicides. You know, people sobbing and complaining about losing someone beloved, but where are the f**king stories of these (deprived) people who commit suicides? Am I supposed to think they killed themselves because of some illusion? Hah, no way! If I'm supposed to think about suicide, it's the freaking last thing, I think about! I think it's so bloody clear, but people just shut up out of politeness or something. Psychiatry should have rife possibilities on telling people what kind of conditions that drive people into suicide, but do they? F**king never!
Objectively, every possible argument in the discussion of (A)S will take effect and thus be effectuated or denied.
You may find this interesting: "Autopsy of a Suicidal Mind
Edwin S. Shneidman, Ph.D., 2004, Oxford University Press.
Autopsy of a Suicidal Mind is a uniquely intensive psychological analysis of a suicidal mind. In this poignant scientific study, the author assembles an extraordinary cast of eight renowned experts to analyze the suicidal materials, including a ten-page suicide note, given to him by a distraught mother looking for insights into her son's tragic death. Each of the eight experts offers a unique perspective and the sum of their conclusions constitutes an extraordinary psychological autopsy. This book is the first of its kind and a remarkable contribution to the study of suicide." I note that this is from 2004 (why not 1985?).
Important:
People may say that they don't subscribe to all or some of the points or that they certainly not subscribe to the hidden motives (of some people). Their very subscription may very well be so, but this doesn't undercut the fact that their position may support it, objectively! Undeniably then, every possible argument in the discussion of (A)S will take part and thus be effectuated or denied. It should on the other hand, incline them to take part in the debate of preventing this kind of vicious thinking or act in different ways to prevent suicide altogether. Clearly, they will fail to prevent the possibility of such attitudes and I think the massive problem of suicide and its origins are too great to make any solid impact on the matter by practical action. Surely then, this impels a certain kind of dissemination of information. Has Simone won?
By examining the reasons for suicide, it can become a right to commit suicide. Open discussions will decide the laws in the various legislative domains/states and nations. This right can be qualified by fulfilling a set of requirements. I also think if people have a real chance to commit suicide legally, they will embark on a different procedure in relation to family and friends. There's also a chance that family and friends will care more and be more alert to factors leading to suicidal tendencies and the whole debate may also take on better characteristics.
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:14 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
Following the pattern of abortion that must be said to be very successful if you look closely on the statistics (leading to more: well being of kids, quality time, time for attention and love and so on), excluding, of course, the Christian conservatives (for them, we go the Hell all the same), I think this can turn out well for legalised (assisted) suicides too, that it gets accepted among the greater parts of the population, that for some, suicide by medicines is a good solution to sickness and other. There's nothing in the way for the possibility that near, dear people can take part in one's departure from life. The very (A)S can represent dignity in many ways, not to say fill many empty spaces (to make society "complete").
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:24 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
I think legalising suicide has the capacity to slash the "doctors'" vile, perverse, gruesome "games" quite heavily to put it bluntly (despite their, the medical doctors, Hippocratic oath)!
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:28 pm UTC + 1 hour; forum.philosophynow.org
The final death to the Con-side of legalising (assisted) suicide:
The Hippocratic Oath poses in NO way any more charity toward anti-suicide than the charity of those who are in favour because both sides may equally say that they support the best humanity and the best dignity of it.
Thus, the mere uttering of a certain "devotion" to dignity is no point as such! Therefore, "I claim to follow the Hippocratic Oath" is just a blow in the air in this sense/relation!
First published by Terje Lea and Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea as "Issues from the Internet"!
My Own Political Prison of Norway!
You know, here I am, suppressed for this Monkey Biz idea of Norway as "their _best_ idea" they can imagine!
Making 500 deals just as I'm making a move abroad (and the further corrpution from the Police Station Chief in Sandnes sitting on a switchboard to my phone-line and various other set-ups! I must say I'm tired of this! (And I really couldn't HATE them more!)
They say that they want your health, but they give you NO lawyer, NO Police services and NO Social Services (in the meaning of providing Social Worker services to take off the steam from all the sh*t you have in your life)!
"Norway is soooo beautiful!" (Heh-heh, you don't know a thing yet, but I agree some of the nature is beautiful if they could cramp it less with detached idiot houses!)
And then the last thing: You're not human anymore, you've become a human robot (that they, the "geniuses" can't understand)!
Anonymous, yes, fairly so, but this is one voice of _hard_ reality coming out of F*cksh*t Norway! Believe what you want!
Making 500 deals just as I'm making a move abroad (and the further corrpution from the Police Station Chief in Sandnes sitting on a switchboard to my phone-line and various other set-ups! I must say I'm tired of this! (And I really couldn't HATE them more!)
They say that they want your health, but they give you NO lawyer, NO Police services and NO Social Services (in the meaning of providing Social Worker services to take off the steam from all the sh*t you have in your life)!
"Norway is soooo beautiful!" (Heh-heh, you don't know a thing yet, but I agree some of the nature is beautiful if they could cramp it less with detached idiot houses!)
And then the last thing: You're not human anymore, you've become a human robot (that they, the "geniuses" can't understand)!
Anonymous, yes, fairly so, but this is one voice of _hard_ reality coming out of F*cksh*t Norway! Believe what you want!
The Work to End the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The Israel-Palestine conflict - Seeking to solve it!
Various! Written by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 13:24:49 [on blog.t-lea.net]
I've written this writing (in Norwegian) to the Committee of Palestine, a Norwegian
committee, I believe, 02:44 AM (night...), Tue 16. Nov.
The writing basically consists in this:
* Why isn't the UN and the EU (among others) on the spot/in the area
with their own, coordinated, observers and work-groups (engineers and
leaders/organisers) on both the Gaza-strip and the West Bank?
[Edit, Unsp.:]
* (Loosely with/by unrealist42:) The observers should use the latest technology in their mission, possibly web-cams for observing the check-points! unrealist42 suggests the use of web-cams for monitoring the check-points directly to the internet by full publicity. This may be too radical, but a moderated use by the observers can be a valuable contribution! Indeed, the latest technology should be applied as in all other (modern) countries so that Palestine can enter contemporary standards on all fronts, including industry! [End of edit.]
* There should be an updated map for the areas of conflict where (as on
the Google maps) one can find check-points, surveillance cameras,
the Wall, the settlements, special conflict-zones, operating UN/EU/others'
activities and all other activity (like "finally" imported goods to the Palestine
areas)!
* I also think there should be a COMMON web-portal for this conflict that is leaded
by UN (in the same fashion as WWF's web-presence). Here I suggest that all activities, in progress and in planning, are being presented/communicated. One should also emphasise the importance of transparency (no side "fools"/"undermines" the other).
* One may also have a money-effort surveillance page under this common portal that displays the actual effort (and direction) to the Palestine areas (and in the long run seriously undermines any hidden support for the tunnels into the Gaza-strip).
* One may also have a "tally" count on the number of people involved and what they do!
* I may come to add more points as we go, but I must say that I think the quality of the "engineering" work for ending this conflict could have been far better and had a better progression! I hope this improves in the immediate future!
[Edit, as extra compared to the email:]
* An addition to this writing on this forum: It should be a standing requirement that the representatives for Palestine accept Israel as a Jewish state on EQUAL footing as Palestine probably announces itself/looks upon itself as a Muslim state (i.e., the sound/massive support of Hamas, a rather (moderately/strongly) Islamic oriented political party). Poor people also tend to mind religious matters more strongly than fx. the affluent Europeans without this being a point, but rather a remark one can lend one's eye to.
* Also, I think the Israeli rhetoric has improved greatly for the last month or so. Though, it's seen as quite provoking that they push on these settlements to this degree.
* One report I've read, says that Israelis choose the settlements mostly for economic reasons and it should be possible to change this incentive or at least highlight it.
* (Loosely by Typist:) The world should support both Israel and Palestine as equal/symmetric states. Hopefully spurring both nations into prosperous, peaceful economic cycles of partnership, cooperation and to the service and benefit from and to the world.
[Edit, 17.11.2010:]
* In relation to the conflict (I-P), I'm also interested in the status of the Palestinian airport and the arrangement for Palestinians to communicate with one another between the Gaza strip and the West Bank. I'd also like to know the routines for moving between these two areas (physically, as the areas are indeed physically apart).
* Communications do include phone connections, mobile and "regular", as well as internet. I'd also include the aspect of communications from the Palestinian areas and to the world at large!
* It must be pointed out that despite the long coast line of the Gaza strip, the Palestinians have no harbour whatsoever! Even the fishing vessels have come under fire or harassment from time to time. There is no problem in conceiving an Israeli administration of a Palestinian harbour during a period of transition!
* There should be no problem in incorporating these concerns into this web-portal if only as static reports or points. [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.09.2011:]
* It needs to be a part of reporting that incidents and wounded and killed are included in the (web-)reports! Formerly, I've hoped that active policing (by the Police forces, Palestinian, internationally strengthened (by non-Israeli) or not and the mere presence of international observers (and set-ups as described above) would reduce incidents and wounded and killed (in direct connection to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, i.e., Israeli killing Palestinian or vice versa). [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.12.2010:]
* It should be mentioned that as Israel is a perpetrator and that it is reluctant to acknowledge valid borders to Palestine, its victim, this may be pathological and the issue should therefore be openly demanded as a few countries already have recognised Palestine an own state. Thus the next point on my "list" for an underlying plan to highlight steps that are needed, is that Israel makes it clear what borders it recognises so that this "pathology" can be safely scrapped, which is most welcomed by the whole world, I assume.
* This website with this map should clearly mark the 1967-borders and the eventual contemporary borders Israel accepts today if any. [End of edit.]
(Sincerely yours,
Mr. Terje Lea)
[Edit, 16.11.2010:] A comment on the side, pertaining to the settlements. It's a fact that the Swiss have been
addressing the Israelis for making Palestine look like a Swiss cheese (a cheese, as we all know, is known for
for its "holes" (bubbles)). [End of edit.]
PS: Let's end this together! (Joke?)
PS2: Typist is a user at the Philosophy Now forum. This entire writing has first been written on this forum.
PS3: unrealist42 is a user over at http://www.philosophyforums.com.
PS4: This plan is updated today, 15.12.2010, despite my protest by not writing. However, don't interpret this as I'm beginning to write again (on my websites).
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1420534/the-israelpalestine-conflict-seeking-to-solve-it/.)
Original URL: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post97
2 further notes to the conflict:
1. note.
Note I side with Turkey over the verdict that "leaked copy of the United Nations report ... But the report also concludes that Israel's naval blockade of Gaza is legal - a move that has angered Turkey" because I think there's no convention (legal) or precedent for such a "legality" in international relations. On the other hand, I suspect "the Patient of Palestine" is suffering under "the Doctor, with split personality", overtly Israel and USA, and covertly, EU and Norway and Colombia shoved in by FDI (foreign direct investment, handler: USA) and "blackened Arab personality/corrupt money (sorry to suggest this). Solution: be aggressive on expressing frustration to friendly/charitable nations so that they can relay the political pressure, both media and diplomatic toward the _un_friendly nations! Good?
End of 1. note.
2. note.
On Israel and 900 new settlement-housing units planned in East Jerusalem: In light of the planning of 900 new housing units, I call for "cautious" sanctions against Israel on all sorts of signal products as Champagne and Parma-ham for their _consistent_ undermining of solutions with their neighbouring Palestinians. This should be discussed at UN. And even though this definite undermining of disciplinary reactions to Israel by USA takes place, I think the other nations are fully entitled to announce their dissatisfaction, thus _increasing_ global pressure against Israel for getting more serious in the conflict. The sanctions can be justified citing worldwide security concerns as incitement for conflict and the obvious idiot will to this incitement by the Israeli. This means that I hope these countries can come together and give these declarations against Israel despite the idiot vetoing by USA for making the full _other_ 6,5 - 7,0 Bn (Billion!) people heard and that _they_ (not USA) get to give this dearly welcomed voice to the Palestinians and their cause for a rightful state with some borders if not directly the 1967 borders to start with! Cheers!
This has also been posted United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights, http://www.facebook.com/UN.palestinianrights.
United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights
The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People...
I'm sorry. The world population number on Wikip. said 7,4 Bn people. US Census says 6 937 326 780 _right now_!
Thus deducting some here and there making it 6,5 rather than 7 at any chance!
The Israelis should be well aware also of the possibility to build larger housing complexes and especially _taller_ so that NO people need to live on occupied territory/settlements obstructing peace with the Palestinians.
This comment of mine comes as reaction, slightly delayed, by the story brought by TV2 with "Publisert 04.04.2011 20.28", that is published on 04.04.2011.
The link: http://www.tv2.no/nyheter/utenriks/midtosten/israel-utvider-bosetning-paa-okkupert-land-3461347.html.
[Israel utvider bosetning på okkupert land]
End of 2. note.
Note: this is meant to continue until the conflict has ended. Thus, more is likely to be added!
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/12/2011 09:40:00 PM with 4 comments!
Various! Written by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 13:24:49 [on blog.t-lea.net]
I've written this writing (in Norwegian) to the Committee of Palestine, a Norwegian
committee, I believe, 02:44 AM (night...), Tue 16. Nov.
The writing basically consists in this:
* Why isn't the UN and the EU (among others) on the spot/in the area
with their own, coordinated, observers and work-groups (engineers and
leaders/organisers) on both the Gaza-strip and the West Bank?
[Edit, Unsp.:]
* (Loosely with/by unrealist42:) The observers should use the latest technology in their mission, possibly web-cams for observing the check-points! unrealist42 suggests the use of web-cams for monitoring the check-points directly to the internet by full publicity. This may be too radical, but a moderated use by the observers can be a valuable contribution! Indeed, the latest technology should be applied as in all other (modern) countries so that Palestine can enter contemporary standards on all fronts, including industry! [End of edit.]
* There should be an updated map for the areas of conflict where (as on
the Google maps) one can find check-points, surveillance cameras,
the Wall, the settlements, special conflict-zones, operating UN/EU/others'
activities and all other activity (like "finally" imported goods to the Palestine
areas)!
* I also think there should be a COMMON web-portal for this conflict that is leaded
by UN (in the same fashion as WWF's web-presence). Here I suggest that all activities, in progress and in planning, are being presented/communicated. One should also emphasise the importance of transparency (no side "fools"/"undermines" the other).
* One may also have a money-effort surveillance page under this common portal that displays the actual effort (and direction) to the Palestine areas (and in the long run seriously undermines any hidden support for the tunnels into the Gaza-strip).
* One may also have a "tally" count on the number of people involved and what they do!
* I may come to add more points as we go, but I must say that I think the quality of the "engineering" work for ending this conflict could have been far better and had a better progression! I hope this improves in the immediate future!
[Edit, as extra compared to the email:]
* An addition to this writing on this forum: It should be a standing requirement that the representatives for Palestine accept Israel as a Jewish state on EQUAL footing as Palestine probably announces itself/looks upon itself as a Muslim state (i.e., the sound/massive support of Hamas, a rather (moderately/strongly) Islamic oriented political party). Poor people also tend to mind religious matters more strongly than fx. the affluent Europeans without this being a point, but rather a remark one can lend one's eye to.
* Also, I think the Israeli rhetoric has improved greatly for the last month or so. Though, it's seen as quite provoking that they push on these settlements to this degree.
* One report I've read, says that Israelis choose the settlements mostly for economic reasons and it should be possible to change this incentive or at least highlight it.
* (Loosely by Typist:) The world should support both Israel and Palestine as equal/symmetric states. Hopefully spurring both nations into prosperous, peaceful economic cycles of partnership, cooperation and to the service and benefit from and to the world.
[Edit, 17.11.2010:]
* In relation to the conflict (I-P), I'm also interested in the status of the Palestinian airport and the arrangement for Palestinians to communicate with one another between the Gaza strip and the West Bank. I'd also like to know the routines for moving between these two areas (physically, as the areas are indeed physically apart).
* Communications do include phone connections, mobile and "regular", as well as internet. I'd also include the aspect of communications from the Palestinian areas and to the world at large!
* It must be pointed out that despite the long coast line of the Gaza strip, the Palestinians have no harbour whatsoever! Even the fishing vessels have come under fire or harassment from time to time. There is no problem in conceiving an Israeli administration of a Palestinian harbour during a period of transition!
* There should be no problem in incorporating these concerns into this web-portal if only as static reports or points. [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.09.2011:]
* It needs to be a part of reporting that incidents and wounded and killed are included in the (web-)reports! Formerly, I've hoped that active policing (by the Police forces, Palestinian, internationally strengthened (by non-Israeli) or not and the mere presence of international observers (and set-ups as described above) would reduce incidents and wounded and killed (in direct connection to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, i.e., Israeli killing Palestinian or vice versa). [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.12.2010:]
* It should be mentioned that as Israel is a perpetrator and that it is reluctant to acknowledge valid borders to Palestine, its victim, this may be pathological and the issue should therefore be openly demanded as a few countries already have recognised Palestine an own state. Thus the next point on my "list" for an underlying plan to highlight steps that are needed, is that Israel makes it clear what borders it recognises so that this "pathology" can be safely scrapped, which is most welcomed by the whole world, I assume.
* This website with this map should clearly mark the 1967-borders and the eventual contemporary borders Israel accepts today if any. [End of edit.]
(Sincerely yours,
Mr. Terje Lea)
[Edit, 16.11.2010:] A comment on the side, pertaining to the settlements. It's a fact that the Swiss have been
addressing the Israelis for making Palestine look like a Swiss cheese (a cheese, as we all know, is known for
for its "holes" (bubbles)). [End of edit.]
PS: Let's end this together! (Joke?)
PS2: Typist is a user at the Philosophy Now forum. This entire writing has first been written on this forum.
PS3: unrealist42 is a user over at http://www.philosophyforums.com.
PS4: This plan is updated today, 15.12.2010, despite my protest by not writing. However, don't interpret this as I'm beginning to write again (on my websites).
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1420534/the-israelpalestine-conflict-seeking-to-solve-it/.)
Original URL: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post97
2 further notes to the conflict:
1. note.
Note I side with Turkey over the verdict that "leaked copy of the United Nations report ... But the report also concludes that Israel's naval blockade of Gaza is legal - a move that has angered Turkey" because I think there's no convention (legal) or precedent for such a "legality" in international relations. On the other hand, I suspect "the Patient of Palestine" is suffering under "the Doctor, with split personality", overtly Israel and USA, and covertly, EU and Norway and Colombia shoved in by FDI (foreign direct investment, handler: USA) and "blackened Arab personality/corrupt money (sorry to suggest this). Solution: be aggressive on expressing frustration to friendly/charitable nations so that they can relay the political pressure, both media and diplomatic toward the _un_friendly nations! Good?
End of 1. note.
2. note.
On Israel and 900 new settlement-housing units planned in East Jerusalem: In light of the planning of 900 new housing units, I call for "cautious" sanctions against Israel on all sorts of signal products as Champagne and Parma-ham for their _consistent_ undermining of solutions with their neighbouring Palestinians. This should be discussed at UN. And even though this definite undermining of disciplinary reactions to Israel by USA takes place, I think the other nations are fully entitled to announce their dissatisfaction, thus _increasing_ global pressure against Israel for getting more serious in the conflict. The sanctions can be justified citing worldwide security concerns as incitement for conflict and the obvious idiot will to this incitement by the Israeli. This means that I hope these countries can come together and give these declarations against Israel despite the idiot vetoing by USA for making the full _other_ 6,5 - 7,0 Bn (Billion!) people heard and that _they_ (not USA) get to give this dearly welcomed voice to the Palestinians and their cause for a rightful state with some borders if not directly the 1967 borders to start with! Cheers!
This has also been posted United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights, http://www.facebook.com/UN.palestinianrights.
United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights
The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People...
I'm sorry. The world population number on Wikip. said 7,4 Bn people. US Census says 6 937 326 780 _right now_!
Thus deducting some here and there making it 6,5 rather than 7 at any chance!
The Israelis should be well aware also of the possibility to build larger housing complexes and especially _taller_ so that NO people need to live on occupied territory/settlements obstructing peace with the Palestinians.
This comment of mine comes as reaction, slightly delayed, by the story brought by TV2 with "Publisert 04.04.2011 20.28", that is published on 04.04.2011.
The link: http://www.tv2.no/nyheter/utenriks/midtosten/israel-utvider-bosetning-paa-okkupert-land-3461347.html.
[Israel utvider bosetning på okkupert land]
End of 2. note.
Note: this is meant to continue until the conflict has ended. Thus, more is likely to be added!
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/12/2011 09:40:00 PM with 4 comments!
Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!
Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-04-27 16:42:59
I want to speculate on the reason why U.S. Americans never really can press the "Nuke the World"-button!
First of all, would the U.S. Americans be able to live with the controversy aftermath considering their very mixed society/societies, with all the ethnicities?
Secondly, are U.S. Americans now dependent on the good "energies" of foreigners now to sustain themselves?
Thirdly, there would be vast environmental impacts and would USA be able to live with this in retrospect? The full nuclear holocaust would destroy vast areas of surface terrain on land and would destroy a vast number of species in addition to the humans.
So I bet that the U.S. Americans are playing with the button in the sense that the great Atlantic and the Pacific will protect them from any aftermath effects and that they are self-sufficient with food capacities and most other minerals and mines and what have you. In theory, there might be a chance then "to create a self-delusion" to self-justify the nuclear destruction to the rest of the world, pending South America in consideration, i.e., how much of our Southies to preserve?
This is of course not entirely serious. I just want to entertain the thought with you and inform people of this notion.
I must also say that this is probably the most cynical thought you may ever get from the U.S. Americans!!! If this thought is utterly removed, the world will have nudged forward a little toward (emotional) world peace (in everyone).
One fine gesture from the U.S. Americans may be to "offer"/"allow" devastating damage to be inflicted on the themselves to remove such an absolutely idiotic thought, thus creating the military/foreign policy of "The Devastating Damage to USA" doctrine! This should make the trick, I think!
So to calm down a few people, I think we need to see an escalation before we happen to think that "U.S. Americans may be pushing the button". I also don't want our good political leaders and business leaders to lie down/back down because some idiot U.S. American is hinting toward this ridiculous notion of pushing the nuclear war button. In every case I want the fear communicated to the right people before our good political leaders and business leaders of EU/Europe/Russia(/China) are to lie down/back down!!! That is, the fear must become expressed! This is normative and please don't make any mistake about it!!!
As I understand it, MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) has been a negative notion in that it has been the main impeller behind the missile defence shield. Thus, MAD in this sense has been the scenario that one has wanted to avoid. Now, on the other hand, I suggest that in case of the World against USA, such a scenario would be seen as so crazy that the sentiment toward MAD, i.e., in the sense of the World (exc. USA) against USA, even in USA would be seen as positive and I think this is an important difference, i.e., seeing MAD in this (new) positive sense and in the negative sense (traditionally thought of as USA vs. Russia/Soviet Union).
Because the momentum for the World (exc. USA) would of course be democracy and not the (evil) communism of Russia/Soviet Union. Thus, ethically, obviously, the World is justified in devastating/destroying USA, possibly in a MAD scenario, and reasonably so in the face of such lunacy altogether.
For world peace and democracy! Cheers!
Note: I've edited this writing today, 2nd May, 2011, with MAD and (evil) communism.
Note2: Originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post171.
Synes godt om · Stop med at følge opslag · 8. august kl. 04:38
This document relates directly to my comment on SCRAMJETS below.
8. august kl. 04:38 · Synes godt om
This document has been uploaded twice. Sorry.
8. august kl. 07:15 · Synes godt om
From Facebook
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:19:00 AM with 0 comments!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-04-27 16:42:59
I want to speculate on the reason why U.S. Americans never really can press the "Nuke the World"-button!
First of all, would the U.S. Americans be able to live with the controversy aftermath considering their very mixed society/societies, with all the ethnicities?
Secondly, are U.S. Americans now dependent on the good "energies" of foreigners now to sustain themselves?
Thirdly, there would be vast environmental impacts and would USA be able to live with this in retrospect? The full nuclear holocaust would destroy vast areas of surface terrain on land and would destroy a vast number of species in addition to the humans.
So I bet that the U.S. Americans are playing with the button in the sense that the great Atlantic and the Pacific will protect them from any aftermath effects and that they are self-sufficient with food capacities and most other minerals and mines and what have you. In theory, there might be a chance then "to create a self-delusion" to self-justify the nuclear destruction to the rest of the world, pending South America in consideration, i.e., how much of our Southies to preserve?
This is of course not entirely serious. I just want to entertain the thought with you and inform people of this notion.
I must also say that this is probably the most cynical thought you may ever get from the U.S. Americans!!! If this thought is utterly removed, the world will have nudged forward a little toward (emotional) world peace (in everyone).
One fine gesture from the U.S. Americans may be to "offer"/"allow" devastating damage to be inflicted on the themselves to remove such an absolutely idiotic thought, thus creating the military/foreign policy of "The Devastating Damage to USA" doctrine! This should make the trick, I think!
So to calm down a few people, I think we need to see an escalation before we happen to think that "U.S. Americans may be pushing the button". I also don't want our good political leaders and business leaders to lie down/back down because some idiot U.S. American is hinting toward this ridiculous notion of pushing the nuclear war button. In every case I want the fear communicated to the right people before our good political leaders and business leaders of EU/Europe/Russia(/China) are to lie down/back down!!! That is, the fear must become expressed! This is normative and please don't make any mistake about it!!!
As I understand it, MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) has been a negative notion in that it has been the main impeller behind the missile defence shield. Thus, MAD in this sense has been the scenario that one has wanted to avoid. Now, on the other hand, I suggest that in case of the World against USA, such a scenario would be seen as so crazy that the sentiment toward MAD, i.e., in the sense of the World (exc. USA) against USA, even in USA would be seen as positive and I think this is an important difference, i.e., seeing MAD in this (new) positive sense and in the negative sense (traditionally thought of as USA vs. Russia/Soviet Union).
Because the momentum for the World (exc. USA) would of course be democracy and not the (evil) communism of Russia/Soviet Union. Thus, ethically, obviously, the World is justified in devastating/destroying USA, possibly in a MAD scenario, and reasonably so in the face of such lunacy altogether.
For world peace and democracy! Cheers!
Note: I've edited this writing today, 2nd May, 2011, with MAD and (evil) communism.
Note2: Originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post171.
Synes godt om · Stop med at følge opslag · 8. august kl. 04:38
This document relates directly to my comment on SCRAMJETS below.
8. august kl. 04:38 · Synes godt om
This document has been uploaded twice. Sorry.
8. august kl. 07:15 · Synes godt om
From Facebook
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:19:00 AM with 0 comments!
The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence ->
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 21:39:00
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of US American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!
Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.
This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!
I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!
Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.
I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play"!!!
The above relates to #NineEleven.
When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!
Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!
This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255[2] active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.
Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Then,
Germany: [numbers]
Spain: [numbers]
Japan: [numbers]
Italy: [numbers]
Greece: [numbers]
Brazil: [numbers]
Cuba: [numbers]
Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!
A side note on diversity of operations:
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this/the other writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!
USA again and their armed forces:
There are 2 nations in the World at current that are direct trouble and these are North Korea and Somalia. Afghanistan is being dealt with, unclear on what grounds because Bin Laden is now shot and dead, Al Qaida has been defeated!
So what is left for these U. S. American slanting about in the World. Why are they "out here with us" and not home on that U. S. American mound where they belong, these two 2 countries exempt and all other official UN missions?
No, there is only one brutal answer: they are USING these forces for something and let's be blatant about it, whether they threaten to push the nuclear ICBM buttons or launch conventional troops on all sorts of countries and other targets, of course, outside all war conventions, usually referred to as the Vienna conventions of war, as with the CIA led Bay of Pigs assault on Cuba!
That's what they're doing, all big facts included, and we need definite actions to that end that they understand that this is deeply unwelcome and unwanted, that they are doing extorting us against our every new idea and company!
How we do it? "Something like Jihad perhaps, but let's be nice about it" and SHOOT/EXECUTE the most disgusting U. S. Americans first and de-select U. S. American goods and services!
We also need to communicate this so we need this to enter media commonly! Alright? This is also a start!
(Remember that North Korea /can/ be controlled from the sea and US American navy vessels can do this by support vessels included so that there's no need for them to have /any/ Japanese bases to that end, except in South Korea, where they are wanted.)
Jihad also means "Jihad (English pronunciation: /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد ǧihād [dʒiˈhæːd]), an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jihād translates as a noun meaning "struggle". Jihad appears 41 times in the Quran and frequently in the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of God (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)".[1][2][3] A person engaged in jihad is called a mujahid; the plural is mujahideen. Jihad is an important religious duty for Muslims." by Wikipedia. Jihad /can/ be interpreted to be "the struggle to stay intelligent and sane and to fight for one's rights so as to rise to Allah's (or God's) intention FOR humankind, that is to rise to WHERE Allah (or God) intended us to be with our full abilities being used! And maybe the U. S. Americans, that they make it hard to make peace with one another, that they engage us to that extent that we remain in poverty and in struggle, rather than eating comfortably from Allah's designated fruits to us by our abilities that we were born with! USA is the counter-intelligence now and they need to be disciplined for it!!! There is NO DOUBT!!!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
Note3: This has been edited today, 12.06.2011 with Accenture and other added.
Note4: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post181.
Note5: Extra text has been added today, from Facebook, written some 3 hours ago to that site.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:21:00 AM with 0 comments!
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of US American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!
Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.
This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!
I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!
Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.
I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play"!!!
The above relates to #NineEleven.
When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!
Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!
This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255[2] active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.
Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Then,
Germany: [numbers]
Spain: [numbers]
Japan: [numbers]
Italy: [numbers]
Greece: [numbers]
Brazil: [numbers]
Cuba: [numbers]
Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!
A side note on diversity of operations:
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this/the other writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!
USA again and their armed forces:
There are 2 nations in the World at current that are direct trouble and these are North Korea and Somalia. Afghanistan is being dealt with, unclear on what grounds because Bin Laden is now shot and dead, Al Qaida has been defeated!
So what is left for these U. S. American slanting about in the World. Why are they "out here with us" and not home on that U. S. American mound where they belong, these two 2 countries exempt and all other official UN missions?
No, there is only one brutal answer: they are USING these forces for something and let's be blatant about it, whether they threaten to push the nuclear ICBM buttons or launch conventional troops on all sorts of countries and other targets, of course, outside all war conventions, usually referred to as the Vienna conventions of war, as with the CIA led Bay of Pigs assault on Cuba!
That's what they're doing, all big facts included, and we need definite actions to that end that they understand that this is deeply unwelcome and unwanted, that they are doing extorting us against our every new idea and company!
How we do it? "Something like Jihad perhaps, but let's be nice about it" and SHOOT/EXECUTE the most disgusting U. S. Americans first and de-select U. S. American goods and services!
We also need to communicate this so we need this to enter media commonly! Alright? This is also a start!
(Remember that North Korea /can/ be controlled from the sea and US American navy vessels can do this by support vessels included so that there's no need for them to have /any/ Japanese bases to that end, except in South Korea, where they are wanted.)
Jihad also means "Jihad (English pronunciation: /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد ǧihād [dʒiˈhæːd]), an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jihād translates as a noun meaning "struggle". Jihad appears 41 times in the Quran and frequently in the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of God (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)".[1][2][3] A person engaged in jihad is called a mujahid; the plural is mujahideen. Jihad is an important religious duty for Muslims." by Wikipedia. Jihad /can/ be interpreted to be "the struggle to stay intelligent and sane and to fight for one's rights so as to rise to Allah's (or God's) intention FOR humankind, that is to rise to WHERE Allah (or God) intended us to be with our full abilities being used! And maybe the U. S. Americans, that they make it hard to make peace with one another, that they engage us to that extent that we remain in poverty and in struggle, rather than eating comfortably from Allah's designated fruits to us by our abilities that we were born with! USA is the counter-intelligence now and they need to be disciplined for it!!! There is NO DOUBT!!!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
Note3: This has been edited today, 12.06.2011 with Accenture and other added.
Note4: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post181.
Note5: Extra text has been added today, from Facebook, written some 3 hours ago to that site.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:21:00 AM with 0 comments!
U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms
U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15
I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and
the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!
Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.
Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.
Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2.
while in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!
It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!
Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )
Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?
To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?
And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?
New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?
Did also USA nuke Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.
It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.
My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.
"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.
United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.
Further: SS KURSK
First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).
Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!
The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.
Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!
Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!
Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.
Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).
I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!
I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!
I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:
"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak!
(This is brought to you with "Jon Stewart's venereal sponsorship"!!!)
Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.
It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!
Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.
Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.
Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!
Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!
So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?
A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.
A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!
The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html
It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png
From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:23:00 AM with 0 comment!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15
I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and
the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!
Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.
Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.
Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2.
while in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!
It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!
Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )
Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?
To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?
And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?
New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?
Did also USA nuke Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.
It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.
My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.
"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.
United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.
Further: SS KURSK
First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).
Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!
The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.
Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!
Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!
Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.
Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).
I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!
I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!
I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:
"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak!
(This is brought to you with "Jon Stewart's venereal sponsorship"!!!)
Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.
It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!
Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.
Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.
Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!
Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!
So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?
A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.
A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!
The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html
It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png
From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:23:00 AM with 0 comment!
Investigations of Corrupt Syndicate of Norway - Approved by the (Powers of) the State - Starting Up Now
On top of this and as a STRONG warning: Norway maybe running a deeply corrupt syndicate/conglomerate by a network rooted in corrupt Police Officers and "military attaches" to most or all of its embassies. With the Oil Fund, the 2nd largest in World, after the Abu Dhabi fund, and its strategy of keeping a liquid "war chest" to be used to all sorts of people with the most dubious motivations, this CAN or WILL get ugly, if it isn't ugly already!!! Norway is a nation with big problems of a "venereal corrupt" type, i.e., the corruption runs in its blood! I can only say, WATCH UP!!!
This remains, though, mostly a background analysis or a "conspiracy theory" as the most serious people want it. Investigations should be well underway already and I suggest that you keep a tab on this nation (of idiocy, of which they don't mind whatsoever)!!!
I must note that this may very well be a kind of "terror against the world at large" and that it falls in line with nutty ideas of "idiots"/severely disturbed people/lunatics who feel that they need to be Gods (decide on their life/death) to other people in order to be respected or receive enough space for their "superior intelligence" to manifest in the World (usually of the human meat shop kind in addition to sufficient number of disasters and human despair according to appetite/sense/whatever, i.e., I have the feeling "now")!
From Facebook, where it was first posted.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:28:00 AM with 0 comment!
This remains, though, mostly a background analysis or a "conspiracy theory" as the most serious people want it. Investigations should be well underway already and I suggest that you keep a tab on this nation (of idiocy, of which they don't mind whatsoever)!!!
I must note that this may very well be a kind of "terror against the world at large" and that it falls in line with nutty ideas of "idiots"/severely disturbed people/lunatics who feel that they need to be Gods (decide on their life/death) to other people in order to be respected or receive enough space for their "superior intelligence" to manifest in the World (usually of the human meat shop kind in addition to sufficient number of disasters and human despair according to appetite/sense/whatever, i.e., I have the feeling "now")!
From Facebook, where it was first posted.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:28:00 AM with 0 comment!
The Newest Writings from Facebook
The Newest Writings from Facebook
"Blut und Ehre" is another contemporary "Nazi" motto that I'd like to address people with as well as it eclipses with the urge to courage very nicely! I've written, earlier, to Amnesty International (AI) about the necessity of courage for achieving decency and honour and this is worth much more than what "these other people" can ever understand. They just "fly on" whatever (whether it's heroin or something else). This is an important decision for You to make! I just tell you... (Blut und Ehre as Courage has the Blood _to_ Honour in it, yet the writing says Courage to Honour (placed with AI)! This may be found contradictory ...
11 Minutes ago.
... , but it isn't because "Blut und Ehre" is just the mantra/motto _leading_ to decency and honour, not necessarily being this, Honour (Ehre) -> Honour (impl.), which is of course to write something strange! (What would Honour to Honour mean other than a version of Tarski's meaning theory or Honour from one person to another person (of Honour)?) Not that I'm against one person of Honour to another person of Honour, but this is a very common notion of friendship or of the Philo love to close connections and the love within the family.
4 Minutes ago.
Somewhere in my blog writings I've pointed to "viral game of sickness". This is to change to "viral, venereal, exotica games of sickness"! Just a notice.
30 Minutes ago.
So on top the the "Love to USA War", I make a version over Hitler's speech to the "Reichstag" in 1939, right before the war on Poland, 1. Sept. 1939: Rund 6,5 (komma) Milliarden Bürger und Bürgerinnen standen damals hinter mir! (And now I get a famous poster where I can get money with my "Brazilien" greeting, stolen from a dead Nazi.)
32 Minutes ago.
Some time ago, I've "invented" a new "cold war", i.e., that I propose for a new "cold war" to start against USA for becomming symmetrical to them, in terms of being able, the rest of the World, to deliver so much damage to them that the mere thought about going to nuclear war or abusing its military power against the World in large parts would immediately prove far too costly! Thus the thought would be banished or ridiculed immediately. This "cold war" is given the name "LoveToUSAWar".
37 Minutes ago.
My references to the point under "Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat" under "Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ...
8. Sept., time, 22:49.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
8. september kl. 22:59.
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
8. september kl. 23:10.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
8. Sept., time, 23:19.
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
10. Sept., time, 18:50.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
10. Sept., time, 18:55.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
10. Sept., time, 18:57.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
Thursday, time, 21:11.
The above writing is intended to point to other references for my opinions on this matter. This is poorly communicated above. The writing on Schrödinger's theory should otherwise be clear. It's _defeated_ by its cat (now a rat)! Something has to be done and I suggest Physics to be redefined in light of it! (Wave Collapse has already been moved to the subject of Psychology and String Theory is set for destruction, i.e., made implausible and untenable! Good?
17 hours ago.
I've watched an interview today on BBC World where Mrs. Kay of BBC America interviews the US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice. It irritates me slightly how USA keeps demanding this fruitless meeting at the negotiation table, but let's meet them! I have this to say. Sure, let them make their demands to one another at a negotiation table at the UN, in New York, in Israel or in Jerusalem, at least somewhere. So they put the demands on the table and begin to "read Donald Duck or whatever" (because they have met so many times before). Thus we meet with the demand/requirement of USA for making a Palestine state. While these people of Israel and Palestine keep meeting one another, here or there, the Palestinians make a bid to the UN Security Council for an own state, The State of Palestine! This state can very well have limited sovereignty to avoid rapid hostility actions to build. This limited sovereignty is to be described under "a transition to normalcy between the two states" as a normalcy between two developed nations, fx. France and Germany. So there we begin... 1. The negotiation table, 2. The bid to the security council, 3. signing the agreement of limited sovereignty "for a peaceful transition to occur", and by this I think we're set to solve this conflict! [If USA keeps being "subversive" they need to be "reminded" of this/hammered by World presure and independent declaration from the other states at the UN, fx. Security Council and so on. Let's hope this doesn't get necessary. Just a formal point though.]
Yesterday, time, 13:37.
Sorry, it's UNISPAL...
Yesterday, time, 13:38.
Alright, posted!
Yesterday, time, 13:39.
The reporters name is Katty Kay! [Finally right!]
Yesterday, time, 13:43.
Also posted to BBC Have Your Say and CNN IReport.
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
In addition to this input, I've gotten the report of CNN by Richard Roth! Peace! [Add. to the above posted to BBC and CNN.]
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
Salem, Shalom... (Love labours on...)
Yesterday, time, 14:39.
I think I've gotten some laughs from this: I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)
Yesterday, time, 14:17.
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!
Yesterday, time, 14:19.
I have 2 further notifications on Scientology this evening. One is about the question over authority. By this, the two pages of "A New Slant on Life", p. 34 and p. 40, make the cult requirement of authority go away forever. There's no doubt! The other is about how the basics relate to the further levels above clear. The so-called secret material. I think I've read somewhere that "all of Scientology lies in the scope of this/the basics". If this is true and I think it is, then the teachings of Scientology can't lie outside of this scope and should therefore be _uncontroversial_! A corroborative to this is that a symbol of Scientology is a green pyramid on the side of and on the back of "The Evolution of a Science". I think it's a fair assertion to say that with time, all the expert stuff of doctorates' dissertations are included in the fundamentals. The word "fundamentals" are found at least two places in this book, "A New Slant...", p. 37 and p. 40! Good? (I think it's reasonable to expect further attacks to spurious and tendentious allegations of critics with dubious motivations by followers of Scientology and I will of course in the future look a the better phrase, fx. the unfounded one above that I've yet to locate in _my_ basics, not tampered with!
Wednesday time, 21:48
Besides, using the volcano on Dianetics to prove the connection to the Xenu story is leading nowhere. As much as the nuke blast in a desert and not on Tokyo is used for something magnificent so can the volcano in general terms!
Wednesday, time, 22:15.
A final word for now on Scientology is that while Scientologists believe in sentences like "do not harm a person of good will" and other good ethics that they share readily with others, the critics are not known for much ethics AT ALL. I suspect to _them_ to be of all sorts of nasty characters and they don't commit to any investigative honesty standard at all, to my knowledge, thus they risk NOTHING in hammering Scientology!
Wednesday time, 22:20.
Facebook, appx. time: 17:18, date: 17.09.2011. All CEST.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/17/2011 05:35:00 PM with 1 comment!
Labels: Facebook, writings
Friday, 16 September 2011
Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat
"Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ... Well, since my living is in this state, I can recommend you to look up indirect observation in every introductory book to Philosophy of Science, especially those from the 90s and further back in time.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
From Facebook where it has been originally posted!
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/16/2011 10:57:00 PM 2 comments
Labels: Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
"Blut und Ehre" is another contemporary "Nazi" motto that I'd like to address people with as well as it eclipses with the urge to courage very nicely! I've written, earlier, to Amnesty International (AI) about the necessity of courage for achieving decency and honour and this is worth much more than what "these other people" can ever understand. They just "fly on" whatever (whether it's heroin or something else). This is an important decision for You to make! I just tell you... (Blut und Ehre as Courage has the Blood _to_ Honour in it, yet the writing says Courage to Honour (placed with AI)! This may be found contradictory ...
11 Minutes ago.
... , but it isn't because "Blut und Ehre" is just the mantra/motto _leading_ to decency and honour, not necessarily being this, Honour (Ehre) -> Honour (impl.), which is of course to write something strange! (What would Honour to Honour mean other than a version of Tarski's meaning theory or Honour from one person to another person (of Honour)?) Not that I'm against one person of Honour to another person of Honour, but this is a very common notion of friendship or of the Philo love to close connections and the love within the family.
4 Minutes ago.
Somewhere in my blog writings I've pointed to "viral game of sickness". This is to change to "viral, venereal, exotica games of sickness"! Just a notice.
30 Minutes ago.
So on top the the "Love to USA War", I make a version over Hitler's speech to the "Reichstag" in 1939, right before the war on Poland, 1. Sept. 1939: Rund 6,5 (komma) Milliarden Bürger und Bürgerinnen standen damals hinter mir! (And now I get a famous poster where I can get money with my "Brazilien" greeting, stolen from a dead Nazi.)
32 Minutes ago.
Some time ago, I've "invented" a new "cold war", i.e., that I propose for a new "cold war" to start against USA for becomming symmetrical to them, in terms of being able, the rest of the World, to deliver so much damage to them that the mere thought about going to nuclear war or abusing its military power against the World in large parts would immediately prove far too costly! Thus the thought would be banished or ridiculed immediately. This "cold war" is given the name "LoveToUSAWar".
37 Minutes ago.
My references to the point under "Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat" under "Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ...
8. Sept., time, 22:49.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
8. september kl. 22:59.
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
8. september kl. 23:10.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
8. Sept., time, 23:19.
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
10. Sept., time, 18:50.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
10. Sept., time, 18:55.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
10. Sept., time, 18:57.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
Thursday, time, 21:11.
The above writing is intended to point to other references for my opinions on this matter. This is poorly communicated above. The writing on Schrödinger's theory should otherwise be clear. It's _defeated_ by its cat (now a rat)! Something has to be done and I suggest Physics to be redefined in light of it! (Wave Collapse has already been moved to the subject of Psychology and String Theory is set for destruction, i.e., made implausible and untenable! Good?
17 hours ago.
I've watched an interview today on BBC World where Mrs. Kay of BBC America interviews the US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice. It irritates me slightly how USA keeps demanding this fruitless meeting at the negotiation table, but let's meet them! I have this to say. Sure, let them make their demands to one another at a negotiation table at the UN, in New York, in Israel or in Jerusalem, at least somewhere. So they put the demands on the table and begin to "read Donald Duck or whatever" (because they have met so many times before). Thus we meet with the demand/requirement of USA for making a Palestine state. While these people of Israel and Palestine keep meeting one another, here or there, the Palestinians make a bid to the UN Security Council for an own state, The State of Palestine! This state can very well have limited sovereignty to avoid rapid hostility actions to build. This limited sovereignty is to be described under "a transition to normalcy between the two states" as a normalcy between two developed nations, fx. France and Germany. So there we begin... 1. The negotiation table, 2. The bid to the security council, 3. signing the agreement of limited sovereignty "for a peaceful transition to occur", and by this I think we're set to solve this conflict! [If USA keeps being "subversive" they need to be "reminded" of this/hammered by World presure and independent declaration from the other states at the UN, fx. Security Council and so on. Let's hope this doesn't get necessary. Just a formal point though.]
Yesterday, time, 13:37.
Sorry, it's UNISPAL...
Yesterday, time, 13:38.
Alright, posted!
Yesterday, time, 13:39.
The reporters name is Katty Kay! [Finally right!]
Yesterday, time, 13:43.
Also posted to BBC Have Your Say and CNN IReport.
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
In addition to this input, I've gotten the report of CNN by Richard Roth! Peace! [Add. to the above posted to BBC and CNN.]
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
Salem, Shalom... (Love labours on...)
Yesterday, time, 14:39.
I think I've gotten some laughs from this: I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)
Yesterday, time, 14:17.
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!
Yesterday, time, 14:19.
I have 2 further notifications on Scientology this evening. One is about the question over authority. By this, the two pages of "A New Slant on Life", p. 34 and p. 40, make the cult requirement of authority go away forever. There's no doubt! The other is about how the basics relate to the further levels above clear. The so-called secret material. I think I've read somewhere that "all of Scientology lies in the scope of this/the basics". If this is true and I think it is, then the teachings of Scientology can't lie outside of this scope and should therefore be _uncontroversial_! A corroborative to this is that a symbol of Scientology is a green pyramid on the side of and on the back of "The Evolution of a Science". I think it's a fair assertion to say that with time, all the expert stuff of doctorates' dissertations are included in the fundamentals. The word "fundamentals" are found at least two places in this book, "A New Slant...", p. 37 and p. 40! Good? (I think it's reasonable to expect further attacks to spurious and tendentious allegations of critics with dubious motivations by followers of Scientology and I will of course in the future look a the better phrase, fx. the unfounded one above that I've yet to locate in _my_ basics, not tampered with!
Wednesday time, 21:48
Besides, using the volcano on Dianetics to prove the connection to the Xenu story is leading nowhere. As much as the nuke blast in a desert and not on Tokyo is used for something magnificent so can the volcano in general terms!
Wednesday, time, 22:15.
A final word for now on Scientology is that while Scientologists believe in sentences like "do not harm a person of good will" and other good ethics that they share readily with others, the critics are not known for much ethics AT ALL. I suspect to _them_ to be of all sorts of nasty characters and they don't commit to any investigative honesty standard at all, to my knowledge, thus they risk NOTHING in hammering Scientology!
Wednesday time, 22:20.
Facebook, appx. time: 17:18, date: 17.09.2011. All CEST.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/17/2011 05:35:00 PM with 1 comment!
Labels: Facebook, writings
Friday, 16 September 2011
Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat
"Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ... Well, since my living is in this state, I can recommend you to look up indirect observation in every introductory book to Philosophy of Science, especially those from the 90s and further back in time.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
From Facebook where it has been originally posted!
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/16/2011 10:57:00 PM 2 comments
Labels: Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
Today's Issues on the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Today's Issues on the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Keywords to start: distance to Tel Aviv from Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. Poverty of Palestinians vs. the status now of these other 3. Why are Palestinians so dangerous, such an existential threat (almost as if the appetite for perversion would need other ways with ending the conflict)? So what is it going to be, you?
More conventionally:
First, if at all, the Palestinians need to get filthy rich just to load that "anti-Israeli nuclear device" onboard (and they are way behind the other 3 countries of relevance, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria). Then, in a state of democracy and thriving business life and vibrant business connections, they, the Palestinians, are supposed to let go of evey civilised advance, possibly over 50 years from now, just to destroy Israel! Plausible? No!!! No, the Palestinians are not those cold, idiotic, senseless, crazy morons! And they don't differ much from these other 3 countries which have far greater liberties for loading aboard this "anti-Israel nuclear device". Comprende? Should I shoot it into your heads, you white-and-blue-flags, stubborn whiners? (How deep are you willing to go/drool for U.S. American (club) money and recognition?) You will soon have the idiot point!
Dear Israelis, say "yes to life"!! Please! Pleeeeaaaaaase! (Probably a wanton from most of the World population)
(A nuclear arms issue has been discussed to some extent. But with plausibility and no reality toward any use "against Israel".)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/23/2011 05:44:00 PM with 5 comments!
Labels: Israel, Palestine
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Logical Set-Up for a Pro-Palestinian Position
The logics as argument follows:
1. Israel has been followed in the past with negative results
2. Palestine* has not been followed (for positive results)
3. Palestine* has a suggestion to be followed or not (for positive results)
----------------------------------------------------
4. Israel must not be followed
5. Palestine[*] must be followed
----------------------------------------------------
6. One follows the Palestine* suggestion
Universe of Discourse, UD: Israelis, Palestinians, Results (and I guess the rest of the World)
I: Israelis
P: Palestinians
R: Results
Symbolic expression, under SD+:
1.| I -> ~R -----------------------------------A (Assumption)
2.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------A
3.| ~(~P -> ~R) ------------------------------A
|----------------------------------------------------
4.| | ~P -> ~R --------------------------------A
| |----------------------------------------------------
5.| | ~(~P -> ~R) ----------------------------3 R
6.| | ~P -> ~R -------------------------------4 R
7.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------4-6 ~E (also ending injection, one step down again)
8.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------2 R
9.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------7 R
|----------------------------------------------------
10.| P -> R ----------------------------------8-9 DS (Disjunctive Syllogism)
Sub-argument:
1. P -> R
2. P
-----------------------
3. P R (_R_eiteration)
-----------------------
4. R Condiitonal elimination
Palestine* is not Palestine yet, it's just a short for its people!
(I need to check up on a few things before I can finish this. Alright?)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/21/2011 03:42:00 PM with 5 comments!
Keywords to start: distance to Tel Aviv from Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. Poverty of Palestinians vs. the status now of these other 3. Why are Palestinians so dangerous, such an existential threat (almost as if the appetite for perversion would need other ways with ending the conflict)? So what is it going to be, you?
More conventionally:
First, if at all, the Palestinians need to get filthy rich just to load that "anti-Israeli nuclear device" onboard (and they are way behind the other 3 countries of relevance, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria). Then, in a state of democracy and thriving business life and vibrant business connections, they, the Palestinians, are supposed to let go of evey civilised advance, possibly over 50 years from now, just to destroy Israel! Plausible? No!!! No, the Palestinians are not those cold, idiotic, senseless, crazy morons! And they don't differ much from these other 3 countries which have far greater liberties for loading aboard this "anti-Israel nuclear device". Comprende? Should I shoot it into your heads, you white-and-blue-flags, stubborn whiners? (How deep are you willing to go/drool for U.S. American (club) money and recognition?) You will soon have the idiot point!
Dear Israelis, say "yes to life"!! Please! Pleeeeaaaaaase! (Probably a wanton from most of the World population)
(A nuclear arms issue has been discussed to some extent. But with plausibility and no reality toward any use "against Israel".)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/23/2011 05:44:00 PM with 5 comments!
Labels: Israel, Palestine
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Logical Set-Up for a Pro-Palestinian Position
The logics as argument follows:
1. Israel has been followed in the past with negative results
2. Palestine* has not been followed (for positive results)
3. Palestine* has a suggestion to be followed or not (for positive results)
----------------------------------------------------
4. Israel must not be followed
5. Palestine[*] must be followed
----------------------------------------------------
6. One follows the Palestine* suggestion
Universe of Discourse, UD: Israelis, Palestinians, Results (and I guess the rest of the World)
I: Israelis
P: Palestinians
R: Results
Symbolic expression, under SD+:
1.| I -> ~R -----------------------------------A (Assumption)
2.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------A
3.| ~(~P -> ~R) ------------------------------A
|----------------------------------------------------
4.| | ~P -> ~R --------------------------------A
| |----------------------------------------------------
5.| | ~(~P -> ~R) ----------------------------3 R
6.| | ~P -> ~R -------------------------------4 R
7.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------4-6 ~E (also ending injection, one step down again)
8.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------2 R
9.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------7 R
|----------------------------------------------------
10.| P -> R ----------------------------------8-9 DS (Disjunctive Syllogism)
Sub-argument:
1. P -> R
2. P
-----------------------
3. P R (_R_eiteration)
-----------------------
4. R Condiitonal elimination
Palestine* is not Palestine yet, it's just a short for its people!
(I need to check up on a few things before I can finish this. Alright?)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/21/2011 03:42:00 PM with 5 comments!
Demand Non-Hackable Operating Systems NOW (and Don't Excuse Them)!!!
Just demand non-hackable Operating Systems right away because you can, of course, by fairly simple means, control every stream of information going in and out of your computer (to the internet). Thus, most dubiously and most exposed, even the snippet on the pornsite that requests outgoing information can be blocked!
Heck, it may not even need to be allowed to do anything in particular either because it's not taking part in safe conventions of programming! Ultimately, you need to explicitly want the malware, virus and spyware and nobody wants that!
The internet should become very safe in near future if corruption isn't insisted upon and crucial services like ISP, services servers (like your bank) and general routing (leave the "telephone-centrals" alone, uttered by the French!) are safe (guaranteed)! It really takes high level intervention to make this corruption work and it should become obvious every time it happens!!!
So why is this, the information in and out of the system, mixed into an inoperable pool of idiocy by Mozilla Firefox and others? When indeed this could have been laid out nicely and orderly!
Just like Microsoft is adding thousands of services and snippets of programming and offering these for free when indeed crucial, but small programs are being ignored! This is nothing less the subversion of the population at large!
No wonder nowadays then that when one orders 50$ of firewall and anti-virus/-malware/-spyware it feels like sponsoring employment programs for idiots!
(I'm having problems with listing Microsoft as a tag on this post! Is the publicity? :-) )
(Also, concerning some mal-delineation, my host is being generous with the editor that I'm writing this into.)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/25/2011 01:41:00 PM with 8 comments!
Heck, it may not even need to be allowed to do anything in particular either because it's not taking part in safe conventions of programming! Ultimately, you need to explicitly want the malware, virus and spyware and nobody wants that!
The internet should become very safe in near future if corruption isn't insisted upon and crucial services like ISP, services servers (like your bank) and general routing (leave the "telephone-centrals" alone, uttered by the French!) are safe (guaranteed)! It really takes high level intervention to make this corruption work and it should become obvious every time it happens!!!
So why is this, the information in and out of the system, mixed into an inoperable pool of idiocy by Mozilla Firefox and others? When indeed this could have been laid out nicely and orderly!
Just like Microsoft is adding thousands of services and snippets of programming and offering these for free when indeed crucial, but small programs are being ignored! This is nothing less the subversion of the population at large!
No wonder nowadays then that when one orders 50$ of firewall and anti-virus/-malware/-spyware it feels like sponsoring employment programs for idiots!
(I'm having problems with listing Microsoft as a tag on this post! Is the publicity? :-) )
(Also, concerning some mal-delineation, my host is being generous with the editor that I'm writing this into.)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/25/2011 01:41:00 PM with 8 comments!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)