The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.

With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"

Note: First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012. Note2: Today, I've tried to inform the ECtHR of serious problems in Norway relating to the formulation of the Breivik Pradox. I've tried to phone them by official number: 00 33388412018 and getting "this number is not in use" by NetCom mob.ph.-services.
Note3: The message to ECtHR has been (upon sending):
I'd like You to know about the Breivik Paradox and the very serious problems it offers in terms of legal practice with a police force already marked by corruption and now is looking for individuals, "whether they remember it or not", traumatic experiences can /easily/ disappear from memory! Here:
The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture
by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.
With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"
(Note: under the message to ECtHR) First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012.
So this should be it.

One Question for UN Secretary General and Everyone Else, Whole World, Whomever...

What is the moral negative value on each and every instance of torture, starting with the mildest level, the water-boarding (gosh, that is so evil!) equivalents, including hanging a person slowly, until unconscious, again and again, until death, this also concerns the sex-games of lunatics ending in the murder of unknowing, innocent people and ALL in reality count!!!?

They say there is no torture, but for real, torture and fear is everywhere!!!

Go ahead and see if you can ignore it?
Can we have the "quants" in too so as to present a credible number?! In order to quantify the negative moral value of torture toward the larger picture of World morality...

Norway is Hereby Disputed (if not for only entertaining the thought, that academic mark!)

When a country insists on corruption and decadence, to be polite, effectively practicing "Modern Despotism", i.e., the rule of raw and brutal power, what are then the (real) value of its borders? Aren't the borders then gone? And given some more factors to and from, bribes and other (packs of whatever cargo content), aren't they thereby impossible to hold with any credibility whatsoever?

And yes, please, send this to your Faculty of Law, any Norwegians out there..., please! Heh-heh-heh, yes, you can choose any...!!! ;-)