Monday, 20 February 2012

Additional Comment to Amnesty at 50 (Years Old)

On [url: http://www.amnesty.org/en/50/timeline] Amn. Int. holds that: "Who we are"
"Amnesty International’s 3 million members believe that human rights abuses anywhere are the concern of people everywhere.
Until every person can enjoy all of their rights, our candle of hope will burn. It will burn until everyone can live in dignity; until every person’s voice can be heard; until no one is tortured or executed."
My opinion: This is my (ethical/legal) view too, except that I stand by the capital punishment (by anasthetics and guillotine, only or not) for the most detached and immoral idiots _taken_! Torture, as it says, is a fundamental problem whenever and every time it happens, whether this is a hidden fact from us or not! Every instance is a fundamental problem! Execution can also be interpreted this way: political prisoners are being executed on (usually, by commonsense and civilised laws) flawed grounds! That is, people are being executed beyond the usual foundations for legal grounding. This is a fundamental problem too, but far milder (at least by shooting/decapitation) than torture and is probably more self-harm in removing the good leaders for the future, I suspect. So in this instance too, execution is indeed an awful problem!
(The French may get offended by "anasthetics and guillotine, only or not", but they have perhaps lost innocence and virginity by now...?
The above by the (headless killings of the French revolution that took its own course back then... (Also: sorry for the painful emotions if any.))

It's fairly remarkable that Amnesty seem so forgiving to criminals _who would otherwise receive the death penalty_ when THEY KNOW about the status of the legal systems in Europe today and how difficult it all is, with various threats of REAL torture and blocked suicide routes only to ensure torture. Not only this, but they seem to count the disappearances/suicides/forged suicided/covered murders (in Europe) lightly well knowing of the grotesque facts we live under today, including the human meatshops of human flesh. So to what lengths can we continue to tolerate when Amn. Int. seem to reject torture so completely and blatantly?! When are they EVER going to take the full moral responsibility for those who are silently and in hidden TORTURED in Europe today? Let's not also forget the technological possibilities... (incl. piezo-RFIDs)!

Here I sit myself without _lawyer_ and without _a possibility to fair trial_ and possibly/likely 15 violations of 30 the my Human Rights by UN _only to make the case for state approved_ torture of myself AGAINST THE JUSTICE department of Norway, also including medical personnel... So why should I SHUT UP??? [You know, what happens when you turn to the Police like I've done lately for threats??? Yes, they send you straight to psychiatry for degradation and insults to your intelligence (probably ONLY on grounds of your personal moral standing, that you can _add_ to human progress and (moral) development!!!]

7 comments:

  1. The whole thing above has first been written to Facebook! More exact time later.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There should be NO doubt that I support the following, personally: harder punishment for crimes, epecially crimes of violence, and especially further crimes of dehabilitation, fx. losing an eye by a complete idiot, the death sentence, the capital punishment by the above, but possibly incl. "the whole row according to degree of menace and immorality" and far more guns in private ownership by revolvers, pistols and rifles, even assault rifles for selected "reserve corpse" individuals, "depending on country specific "intensity" and the need to protect and defend the country's corporate life/financial life"!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. With others, now, I suspect I'm entitled to demand that the entire Amnesty International Norway by its lawyers/barristers leave the Norwegian Bar Association and leave the organisation also for *betraying*, directly, their commitment to Human Rights (whether the ECHR or UNHR) and general legal system duties in their own country! Not only this, but in doing so, they have ridiculed Amnesty International as name and nullified its original intention to strengthen the Human Rights everywhere, also in its own country, Norway! Goodbye!

    (Perhaps the countryside by their own "Red Khmer"?)

    To Amnesty International "Norge", directly: Tunisia, ja, "like", ja, her er sannheten: With others, now, I suspect I'm entitled to demand that the entire Amnesty International Norway by its lawyers/barristers leave the Norwegian Bar Association and leave the organisation also for *betraying*, directly, their commitment to Human Rights (whether the ECHR or UNHR) and general legal system duties in their own country! Not only this, but in doing so, they have ridiculed Amnesty International as name and nullified its original intention to strengthen the Human Rights everywhere, also in its ..."

    Yes, I sit here and realise I write about broken business conventions, then it strikes me! What am I excusing Amnesty International "Norge" for??? No, f*ck them! And I have, please read above! Good riddance to (monkey-bizzin') idiots!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Case over the Death Sentence ->

    That I cite the disagreement over the opposition to the death sentence for "non-principal" and that this has a specific reasoning.

    Apart:
    I also dispute that the UDHR article 3 or some, "The right to life" defends against the death penalty because the UDHR doesn't cover punishment for criminals (who truly deserve it).

    ReplyDelete
  5. A signal for approval of "carnivore mentalities" as the normative to society is no good either, rewarding the murderers with "extended life" and "possible jail-breaks (with a blind eye or not" while of course, the victim gets DEATH and the relatives (of a good person) loose an important person in their lives, with deep griefs to go, the beloved forever gone from their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To Amnesty International Worldwide

    Your usefulness can now be (reliably) tested by Quantum Computing (OR-gate cycling). Is AI of any use... True/false.

    You are bragging of your 600 000 members when you should have had 2 Bn members including families!

    Beware, morons! The time for corrupt behaviour is d*mn UP! You have earnt your monster behind your face, enemy of humanity for "poor performance" over many years!

    Dr. Lukas F Olsnes-Lea
    (Dr. Terje Lea, finally,a former friend. I happen to think you know my name.)
    #UDHR #Democracy #2A #Article3 #KantianEthics #EthicalMoralCharacter

    White or black, Amnesty International? Learn more from "Every Breath You Take", The Police: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMOGaugKpzs
    #PoeticJustice #Victim #Lies #TrueJustice

    ReplyDelete
  7. Given Quantum Computing testing of AI:
    "Your usefulness can now be (reliably) tested by Quantum Computing (OR-gate cycling). Is AI of any use... True/false."
    I expect, indeed, a low number, guessing minus 25 million by 30 million cycles sensitivity. That's low! "That's very low, Vincent!" Max, the cab driver in Collateral.

    ReplyDelete