Note on CIA - The Charges... Separately from "Financial Radicalism"

Further on CIA and the charge against them for generating "simple psychologies": So, after "so much terrorism against itself", exactly, what is the "Anti-Terrorism" report of the CIA?

What is it's contents? And what are the official adversaries of USA in it? Do they manage to set up an organisation at all and does it have a country to reside in? I doubt it. Indeed, I think they are (in hiding) now setting up their own adversaries to excuse their own existence and the human rights violations they take part in for making it happen, a kind of "evil-advocacy".

They don't need to identify other countries' threats! That's not their job! But they are not to set up covert threats against other countries either. Their job is to protect the 50 states of USA, at least primarily, if not also American Samoa and a bit more.

So then, as a trait of the World today, not the destruction of the fishes' breeding grounds then under the sea, near the Gulf Stream center or "a nice" place in the Pacific or the other places where fishes breed? This is not a charge against CIA, but the real charge is that, by their flaws toward rules and regulations, by insanity too, they help bring on very negative events in the World that largely go unaddressed because the threats are fairly severe and under CIA, as a kind of monitored hostility, other countries fail to counter-act them! This is the message.

If not the lying on Iraq and its non-existant WMDs or the sacking of the Iraqi central bank or the first promise, that Iraq now after the Desert Storm and being ousted from Kuwait now was to reside inside "responsibility" because all was set up for this to happen now and for always, given modern possibilites, by sanctions, and ten other agreements to its sins against "Arab-brothers".

Concl.: CIA has to be disbanded, the organisation needs to go out of existence!

It started with US American Financial Radicalism and Warning! (I know, I'm so cool.) Alright. I just say it: My judgment is that

CIA IS SUBVERSION

and that the organisation has a culture of generating "simple psychologies"! Like it or not! I die on this! ("For today.")

You can also compare the number of agents, a mix of civilians and military vs. the British equiv. MI6 (Military Intelligence, Section 6) and how the British are careful in (not) mixing the civilian and military "considerations", by only a 20 people staff. The CIA has no such distinction and "blows away" all of its 20 000, regardless!

While we in Europe have believed in freedom and competition bewteeen the corporations and "entertained" the serious debate, they have moved the other way, many or all: CONTROL!

A fine point(é) against CIA is possibly this: given /their own/ notions over matters of human intelligence, purely they are to self-annihilate as organisation because their statement is of such kind that "no limit bla, bla, bla, ... that people are bound to being "this" forever!" Hurray for UN! To the future!

Under certain presuppositions, I have to the CIA:
◾Objective ethics
◾Religious beliefs logically defended and under telepathy and Van Lommel-studies too(otherwise, "the priests' stories")
◾My attacks on The Stranger by Camus over human nature now that they've been "shown to be...", i.e., the BIG intelligence competition and the Arab number
◾The findings by mSomatism are to be included here as well

Now that it turns out that /I/ was with the DeepBlue against Kasparov in a programmed computer defeat of him, i.e., the former references from Sweden also, I am all the more happy!

Not that I enter such slander but some have said that CIA has had a bit of "earth ants" mark on them in the past. Just as a remark put inside the Graham Norton show of Britain.

Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA !

(Not only their "earth ant" reputation from a field "down South" from New York, but also "much of their explicit behaviour from all other".)

Some symptoms from their neighbouring Princeton University: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45688354/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/can-ignorance-make-better-democracy-fish-it-can/#.UNT8n4MTlTK - Science story over fish-schools.
Url more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2102612,00.html - America Votes with the Fishes.
(Perhaps they are a bit slanderous. That we must respect that they build a standard reference database for these types of "animal-studies".)

End remark for now: I apologise that this presentation is lacking in firmness of disposition that I am "nowhere near studies by the library", given a dire personal situation in corruption-Norway.