Thursday 29 September 2011

Today's Issues on the Palestine-Israel Conflict

Today's Issues on the Palestine-Israel Conflict

Keywords to start: distance to Tel Aviv from Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. Poverty of Palestinians vs. the status now of these other 3. Why are Palestinians so dangerous, such an existential threat (almost as if the appetite for perversion would need other ways with ending the conflict)? So what is it going to be, you?

More conventionally:
First, if at all, the Palestinians need to get filthy rich just to load that "anti-Israeli nuclear device" onboard (and they are way behind the other 3 countries of relevance, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria). Then, in a state of democracy and thriving business life and vibrant business connections, they, the Palestinians, are supposed to let go of evey civilised advance, possibly over 50 years from now, just to destroy Israel! Plausible? No!!! No, the Palestinians are not those cold, idiotic, senseless, crazy morons! And they don't differ much from these other 3 countries which have far greater liberties for loading aboard this "anti-Israel nuclear device". Comprende? Should I shoot it into your heads, you white-and-blue-flags, stubborn whiners? (How deep are you willing to go/drool for U.S. American (club) money and recognition?) You will soon have the idiot point!

Dear Israelis, say "yes to life"!! Please! Pleeeeaaaaaase! (Probably a wanton from most of the World population)

(A nuclear arms issue has been discussed to some extent. But with plausibility and no reality toward any use "against Israel".)
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/23/2011 05:44:00 PM with 5 comments!

Labels: Israel, Palestine

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Logical Set-Up for a Pro-Palestinian Position

The logics as argument follows:

1. Israel has been followed in the past with negative results
2. Palestine* has not been followed (for positive results)
3. Palestine* has a suggestion to be followed or not (for positive results)
----------------------------------------------------
4. Israel must not be followed
5. Palestine[*] must be followed
----------------------------------------------------
6. One follows the Palestine* suggestion

Universe of Discourse, UD: Israelis, Palestinians, Results (and I guess the rest of the World)
I: Israelis
P: Palestinians
R: Results

Symbolic expression, under SD+:

1.| I -> ~R -----------------------------------A (Assumption)
2.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------A
3.| ~(~P -> ~R) ------------------------------A
|----------------------------------------------------
4.| | ~P -> ~R --------------------------------A
| |----------------------------------------------------
5.| | ~(~P -> ~R) ----------------------------3 R
6.| | ~P -> ~R -------------------------------4 R
7.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------4-6 ~E (also ending injection, one step down again)
8.| (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------2 R
9.| ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------7 R
|----------------------------------------------------
10.| P -> R ----------------------------------8-9 DS (Disjunctive Syllogism)

Sub-argument:

1. P -> R
2. P
-----------------------
3. P R (_R_eiteration)
-----------------------
4. R Condiitonal elimination

Palestine* is not Palestine yet, it's just a short for its people!

(I need to check up on a few things before I can finish this. Alright?)

Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/21/2011 03:42:00 PM with 5 comments!

1 comment:

  1. Rather than the Trinity postings (3) on Whatiswritten777, this one is for the God-less considerations of black, the colour for this blog, overall. That "us 2", 2 being the number for a couple, and the song "we're in this [blackness] together", for the name, Controversial777 that is no joyride, take it from me...

    ReplyDelete