Note on CIA - The Charges... Separately from "Financial Radicalism"

Further on CIA and the charge against them for generating "simple psychologies": So, after "so much terrorism against itself", exactly, what is the "Anti-Terrorism" report of the CIA?

What is it's contents? And what are the official adversaries of USA in it? Do they manage to set up an organisation at all and does it have a country to reside in? I doubt it. Indeed, I think they are (in hiding) now setting up their own adversaries to excuse their own existence and the human rights violations they take part in for making it happen, a kind of "evil-advocacy".

They don't need to identify other countries' threats! That's not their job! But they are not to set up covert threats against other countries either. Their job is to protect the 50 states of USA, at least primarily, if not also American Samoa and a bit more.

So then, as a trait of the World today, not the destruction of the fishes' breeding grounds then under the sea, near the Gulf Stream center or "a nice" place in the Pacific or the other places where fishes breed? This is not a charge against CIA, but the real charge is that, by their flaws toward rules and regulations, by insanity too, they help bring on very negative events in the World that largely go unaddressed because the threats are fairly severe and under CIA, as a kind of monitored hostility, other countries fail to counter-act them! This is the message.

If not the lying on Iraq and its non-existant WMDs or the sacking of the Iraqi central bank or the first promise, that Iraq now after the Desert Storm and being ousted from Kuwait now was to reside inside "responsibility" because all was set up for this to happen now and for always, given modern possibilites, by sanctions, and ten other agreements to its sins against "Arab-brothers".

Concl.: CIA has to be disbanded, the organisation needs to go out of existence!

It started with US American Financial Radicalism and Warning! (I know, I'm so cool.) Alright. I just say it: My judgment is that

CIA IS SUBVERSION

and that the organisation has a culture of generating "simple psychologies"! Like it or not! I die on this! ("For today.")

You can also compare the number of agents, a mix of civilians and military vs. the British equiv. MI6 (Military Intelligence, Section 6) and how the British are careful in (not) mixing the civilian and military "considerations", by only a 20 people staff. The CIA has no such distinction and "blows away" all of its 20 000, regardless!

While we in Europe have believed in freedom and competition bewteeen the corporations and "entertained" the serious debate, they have moved the other way, many or all: CONTROL!

A fine point(é) against CIA is possibly this: given /their own/ notions over matters of human intelligence, purely they are to self-annihilate as organisation because their statement is of such kind that "no limit bla, bla, bla, ... that people are bound to being "this" forever!" Hurray for UN! To the future!

Under certain presuppositions, I have to the CIA:
◾Objective ethics
◾Religious beliefs logically defended and under telepathy and Van Lommel-studies too(otherwise, "the priests' stories")
◾My attacks on The Stranger by Camus over human nature now that they've been "shown to be...", i.e., the BIG intelligence competition and the Arab number
◾The findings by mSomatism are to be included here as well

Now that it turns out that /I/ was with the DeepBlue against Kasparov in a programmed computer defeat of him, i.e., the former references from Sweden also, I am all the more happy!

Not that I enter such slander but some have said that CIA has had a bit of "earth ants" mark on them in the past. Just as a remark put inside the Graham Norton show of Britain.

Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA !

(Not only their "earth ant" reputation from a field "down South" from New York, but also "much of their explicit behaviour from all other".)

Some symptoms from their neighbouring Princeton University: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45688354/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/can-ignorance-make-better-democracy-fish-it-can/#.UNT8n4MTlTK - Science story over fish-schools.
Url more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2102612,00.html - America Votes with the Fishes.
(Perhaps they are a bit slanderous. That we must respect that they build a standard reference database for these types of "animal-studies".)

End remark for now: I apologise that this presentation is lacking in firmness of disposition that I am "nowhere near studies by the library", given a dire personal situation in corruption-Norway.

Conspiracy Theory: What If USA by Intelligence Operations Took Out the Religious Jews in Europe?

Conspiracy theory: what if USA by intelligence operations _took out_ the religious Jews as the biggest and hardest of the religious groups prior to and in WW2 so as to control the "white soup" all by itself and then make, by pure force, religions everywhere in Europe as the 2nd or 1st most developed part of the World, to halt or put religious people everywhere else in the World in _deep decline or economical despair_??? I'm only asking just as Stephen Colbert is asking questions!!!
Do you mind us hearing it, USA? "We respect religious people everywhere in the World and China should be allowed the weaker yuan to allow China more space to grow in!!!" ("We may suck your d*cks too, A LOT!!!")
That is, to make religions _unpopular_!
A quarter point is granted a person from South Korea for citing South Korea to "take on" the "European" code of 60 % Atheists!
Probably from under U. S. American coercion and NOT from Europe as they may be inclined to believe because we, the Europeans, have no large military set-ups going and they have exactly that in South Korea (from under the threats of (set-up by USA?) North Korea)!!!

Note: first posted on Facebook some minutes ago!

Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!

Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-04-27 16:42:59

I want to speculate on the reason why U.S. Americans never really can press the "Nuke the World"-button!

First of all, would the U.S. Americans be able to live with the controversy aftermath considering their very mixed society/societies, with all the ethnicities?

Secondly, are U.S. Americans now dependent on the good "energies" of foreigners now to sustain themselves?

Thirdly, there would be vast environmental impacts and would USA be able to live with this in retrospect? The full nuclear holocaust would destroy vast areas of surface terrain on land and would destroy a vast number of species in addition to the humans.

So I bet that the U.S. Americans are playing with the button in the sense that the great Atlantic and the Pacific will protect them from any aftermath effects and that they are self-sufficient with food capacities and most other minerals and mines and what have you. In theory, there might be a chance then "to create a self-delusion" to self-justify the nuclear destruction to the rest of the world, pending South America in consideration, i.e., how much of our Southies to preserve?

This is of course not entirely serious. I just want to entertain the thought with you and inform people of this notion.

I must also say that this is probably the most cynical thought you may ever get from the U.S. Americans!!! If this thought is utterly removed, the world will have nudged forward a little toward (emotional) world peace (in everyone).

One fine gesture from the U.S. Americans may be to "offer"/"allow" devastating damage to be inflicted on the themselves to remove such an absolutely idiotic thought, thus creating the military/foreign policy of "The Devastating Damage to USA" doctrine! This should make the trick, I think!

So to calm down a few people, I think we need to see an escalation before we happen to think that "U.S. Americans may be pushing the button". I also don't want our good political leaders and business leaders to lie down/back down because some idiot U.S. American is hinting toward this ridiculous notion of pushing the nuclear war button. In every case I want the fear communicated to the right people before our good political leaders and business leaders of EU/Europe/Russia(/China) are to lie down/back down!!! That is, the fear must become expressed! This is normative and please don't make any mistake about it!!!

As I understand it, MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) has been a negative notion in that it has been the main impeller behind the missile defence shield. Thus, MAD in this sense has been the scenario that one has wanted to avoid. Now, on the other hand, I suggest that in case of the World against USA, such a scenario would be seen as so crazy that the sentiment toward MAD, i.e., in the sense of the World (exc. USA) against USA, even in USA would be seen as positive and I think this is an important difference, i.e., seeing MAD in this (new) positive sense and in the negative sense (traditionally thought of as USA vs. Russia/Soviet Union).

Because the momentum for the World (exc. USA) would of course be democracy and not the (evil) communism of Russia/Soviet Union. Thus, ethically, obviously, the World is justified in devastating/destroying USA, possibly in a MAD scenario, and reasonably so in the face of such lunacy altogether.

For world peace and democracy! Cheers!

Note: I've edited this writing today, 2nd May, 2011, with MAD and (evil) communism.

Note2: Originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post171.
Synes godt om · Stop med at følge opslag · 8. august kl. 04:38

This document relates directly to my comment on SCRAMJETS below.
8. august kl. 04:38 · Synes godt om
This document has been uploaded twice. Sorry.
8. august kl. 07:15 · Synes godt om
From Facebook
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:19:00 AM with 0 comments!

U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms

U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15

I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and

the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!

Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.

Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.

Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2.

while in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!

It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!

Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )

Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?

To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?

And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?

New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?

Did also USA nuke Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.

It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.

My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.

"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.

United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.

Further: SS KURSK

First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).

Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!

The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.

Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!

Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!

Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.

Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).

I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!

I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!

I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:

"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"

Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!

It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.

This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!

If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak!

(This is brought to you with "Jon Stewart's venereal sponsorship"!!!)

Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.

It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!

Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.

Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.

Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!

Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!

So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?

A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.

A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!

The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html

It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png

From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.

Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:23:00 AM with 0 comment!