An attempt (preliminary) for definition:
"The "political attempt" is what takes place, rightfully/morally, when or if a state violates its own (explicit) duties toward individual citizens or groups of people, e.g. IRA, Irish Republican Army, may be said to do (ethical/moral) political attempts in its "armed struggle" against the (alleged?) oppression of Irish/of Irish descent Catholics in Northern Ireland. The "armed struggle" by Palestine Liberation Organization, PLO is also an example (possibly) of people doing political attempts. I also happen to think a number of citizens have committed political attempts though they are generally not mentioned by media as media seldom reports violations of citizens in democracies!)"
IRA: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/topics/troubles_politics and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army.
PLO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization.
Individual citizens as victims of state crime have largely been neglected by politically correct/corrupt media so don't expect to find material about them. Just for mentioning one person, though a dubious person and an alleged Neo-Nazi, Timothy McVeigh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh. (Be careful in seeing this guy as carrying out "political attempt", however.)
--------------
Some side notes over state crimes:
Anders Behring Breivik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik can be mentioned as one guy criticizing political correctness, but his criticism goes "here and there".
I accuse Jens Stoltenberg for enlisting a gang for the means to his political ends/gains known as The (Nazi) Jugend List where Nazi Jugend describes a band of people possibly going all the way by immoral actions, such as torture of people and more (threats, etc.). I also suspect Stoltenberg for living in Farsund local district for some time, probably thereby starting his enlisting of horrible/dubious people. To be true, I don't know the story 100%. I may be wrong.
I can also claim that Norwegian vileness may have had tentacles to genocidal Serbia from 1991 - 1995 and so may have had "people on the ground" during the Srebrenica massacre ("perhaps" never mentioned by Norwegian media nor ever been given an account of by them):
"2 - Norwegian Assistance to BiH 1991-2008"
"Norway became engaged in the Western Balkans as soon as hostilities broke out in
1991, by providing humanitarian assistance in BiH and Croatia. Once the DPA was
signed, focus was shifted towards reconstruction and development, and subsequently
to aiding the process of Euro-Atlantic association, state-building and democratization.
Support for the Western Balkans was classified as Official Development Assistance
(ODA) and thus could have been expected to be handled by Norway’s development
cooperation agency Norad. Because of the highly political nature of Norway’s
engagement in the region, however, and the fact that the main actors on the donor
side were political and/or security bodies like the EU, OSCE and NATO, the MFA
decided that it would manage the funds itself. Only during the period 1999-2003
was Norad formally involved, when it was asked to manage the medium-term
activities in BiH and Albania. All along, however, Norway emphasized the importance
of ensuring that its aid was aligned with and supported overall policy objectives
of the international community."
"During the period 1992-1995, the annual allocations were for humanitarian aid and
relief, along with support to IDPs. The key aim for Norway’s early aid, according to
an MFA review document from 1997, was “to assist the refugees as close to their
place of origin as possible. The Norwegian program has therefore had BiH as its
focus of attention” (Annex I, our translation). The Budget Documents presented a
running political analysis of the conflict, being quite realistic concerning the timelines
and how soon the conflict might end during the first years."
Ref.: "Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans" by https://www.oecd.org/derec/norway/45900070.pdf, p. 13.
I claim that parts of or all the Norwegian vileness to Serbia has been led by Jens Stoltenberg and his associates.
Jens Stoltenberg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_Stoltenberg, where the biography of his has a black hole from "10 yo. to 40 yo.", I don't know exactly how big it is. Again, the media has been ignorant/neglecting (of its duties).
--------------
By political science, there is a traditional rightness to political attempt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution - Right to revolt or commit the political attempt:
"Individual or collective right"
"Although some explanations of the right of revolution leave open the possibility of its exercise as an individual right, it was clearly understood to be a collective right under English constitutional and political theory."
"In political philosophy, the right of revolution is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without probable cause."
Further: "The U.S. Declaration of Independence states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government""
Not that I think there will be a revolution in "democratic" Norway, but that the right or in fact the duty to commit the political attempt is protected and natural as answer to injustice by deep abuses of power, whether failure to defend your UDHR Human Rights or other!
--------------
Personally and for example, in gaining (more) motivation for the political attempt:
People everywhere may feel offended by the Norwegian, public, inhumane treatment of my person. Thus valid (ethical) threats from everywhere by political attempt? Human Rights (UDHR) should prevail everywhere! To victory, globally!
relief, along with support to IDPs. The key aim for Norway’s early aid, according to
an MFA review document from 1997, was “to assist the refugees as close to their
place of origin as possible. The Norwegian program has therefore had BiH as its
focus of attention” (Annex I, our translation). The Budget Documents presented a
running political analysis of the conflict, being quite realistic concerning the timelines
and how soon the conflict might end during the first years."
Ref.: "Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans" by https://www.oecd.org/derec/norway/45900070.pdf, p. 13.
I claim that parts of or all the Norwegian vileness to Serbia has been led by Jens Stoltenberg and his associates.
Jens Stoltenberg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_Stoltenberg, where the biography of his has a black hole from "10 yo. to 40 yo.", I don't know exactly how big it is. Again, the media has been ignorant/neglecting (of its duties).
--------------
By political science, there is a traditional rightness to political attempt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution - Right to revolt or commit the political attempt:
"Individual or collective right"
"Although some explanations of the right of revolution leave open the possibility of its exercise as an individual right, it was clearly understood to be a collective right under English constitutional and political theory."
"In political philosophy, the right of revolution is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without probable cause."
Further: "The U.S. Declaration of Independence states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government""
Not that I think there will be a revolution in "democratic" Norway, but that the right or in fact the duty to commit the political attempt is protected and natural as answer to injustice by deep abuses of power, whether failure to defend your UDHR Human Rights or other!
--------------
Personally and for example, in gaining (more) motivation for the political attempt:
People everywhere may feel offended by the Norwegian, public, inhumane treatment of my person. Thus valid (ethical) threats from everywhere by political attempt? Human Rights (UDHR) should prevail everywhere! To victory, globally!
