The Legal Process is Finished (in Norway) - Legal Summary

Norway is defeated easily by appeal to Article 6.1, ECHR, by refusing myself the "access to court" and "fair hearing".

The fact that not a single legal meeting has taken place with the most important 2nd level court, the Borgarting lagmannsrett, settles this question.

Further, evidently, their verdict against me on grounds of missing requirements to serving the summons must be the instance of very black legal humour... hence the violation of "The Courts' Act" (NO: "Domstolloven"), to have the cases legally processed effectively according to profession and demands from society to rule of law.

This judgment is likely to obtain with the most novice chess-player, only some interest present.

On grounds that I may not be able to "come out of Norway alive", I choose to publish the list of legal documents, all that I have privately, in order to secure the "justice after my death".

The List:
The High Court of Justice, "Høyesterett". Verdict: Appeal dismissed.

The County Court, 2nd Level Court, "Borgarting lagmannsrett". Verdict: Appeal dismissed, the summons lacking the requirements. See "Domstolloven", the Courts' Act.

The Magistrates' Court, Local Court, "Asker og Bærum tingrett". Verdict: Defeat, the summons dismissed, a result that I've "provoked" because of judge's failure to understand "Common process" -> "NO: Fastsettelsesdom", verdict of guilt.

The documents:

- Høyesterett, Case no. 1170/2013. Date: 2013-06-25.

Høyesterett: 1 document by records.

- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 26 - Date: 2013-06-14.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett 

- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 25 - Date: 2013-06-14.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett 

- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 18 - Date: 2013-05-10.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett 

- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 10 - Date: 2013-04-23.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett

Borgarting lagmannsrett: 4 documents by records.

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 40 - Date: 2013-04-15.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 31 - Date: 2013-03-25.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 19 - Date: 2013-03-08.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 18 - Date: 2013-03-07.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 12 - Date: 2013-02-25.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 5 - Date: 2013-01-15.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 3 - Date: 2012-12-13.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett

Asker og Bærum tingrett: 7 documents by records.Formally: Summons delivered November/December 2012.The Local Court contacted already in April, 2012.

Digitally signed: T. Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea, full legal name, Norway.

The failure of publishing my verdict from the Norwegian High Court of Justice (Høyesterett) and violating Norwegian law (offentleglova, offl.), makes me do it myself, that I'm no deluded idiot with a imaginary 2013/1170:

1

2

Lovdata has also been filed to the police for this, 1 of 24 employees, minimally.

The underlying facts for my case against Norway are, in terms of ECtHR by ECHR, Art. 6.1:

3

The failure, refusing me to deliver a complaint straight, of the police to comply with the police instructions under the Police Act, "Politiloven", also constitues "an attack on my person by obstructing my right to personal weapon".

4

Finally, my complaint gets registered by the police in 2003, subverting my course to justice by 3 years, minimally, and after a long strenuous process, after first having contacted various people in Farsund "kommune", first and foremost the police there, 5 times, starting with 1992, possibly, one contact with Kristiansand police while attending school there in 1996, February or so, one time in Oslo, late winter before spring in 1999, moving to Sandnes, definitely CUTTING the Farsund connection for good in 2000, despite a temporary stay there again in 2005.

The Nation, Norway, is Being Surrendered

Dear EU, UN, The World


2013-07-20.


Declaration, formal or informal: I, Olsnes-Lea, hereby surrender this idiocy of a broken nation, Norway, to all other nations of planet Earth, under UN!


We hope for Your first acts of nation management as soon as possible. Thank You!


Silent reference: TV2 (Norway).


The informed foundation for these words is most convincing, i.e., torture is rife, ethics is blown of the nation, the headless nation. Case is to be completed later.


I expect by this that Sweden heads the EU delegation to this task and that UN organises the rest as the requests follow from these two political entities.


Url: http://controversial777.blogspot.no/2012/09/norway-is-hereby-disputed-if-not-for.html .


Sincerely Yours,
L. F. Olsnes-Lea

(Norway, under Sweden?)

Grounding, also with a suitably hard electrical JOLT:
No State of Norway?

The foundation for this claim:
1. The state has sunk so low in delinquency that it now supports (rife) crime everywhere, by my references of 2013/1170 (implying Mars/Snickers syndicate and Nike criminal collaboration by fraudulent treatment of the Air sole patent), the direct and approved human rights violations of "Tech-Eyes" and other criminal implants, the state-crime (systematic) persecution of people affected with suicide issues, i.e., thinking about killing themselves, the failure to persecute and  apprehend criminals for fx. "system killing by design" and "insurance scam" by SS Scandinavian Star plus 10 or more very serious instances of international and internal/domestic systematic crimes in terms of "plans"/"agreements" and to such ends that people have been muted to silence by torture threats and criminal persecution for the rest of their (miserable) lives, crippling media/public discussion, overtly/covertly/subliminally (by these threats)!

Conclusion: derelict legal system of Norway that results in NOT ANYMORE ANY RESPONSIBLE STATE OF NORWAY!

Note: a country of backstabbing, criminals to criminals backstabbing in high-volatility crime-Norway, law-abiding population is pushed outside the legal society altogether because the corrupt leaders are entrenching their positions with no other choice than to expose and seek to kill these corrupt people, making them backstabbing to many other people themselves (although in special terms only), many times killing other people just to present themselves in the courtroom to object to society!


(I dare you! What's your account?)

The Act of Objecting to Intelligence - Subversion of the World

On corrupt personalities/minds and intelligence in the World - My achievements

1. Never in history has it ever occurred that people have objected to intelligence.

2. As they whine and cry about my achievements and plan their "low" crimes, they become corrupt. Effectively, they celebrate corruption, every crime to others, all misery and tragedy. Corruption has become their hidden pleasure and "virtue".

3. As they have become corrupt, I get accused of having corrupted them. The real reason is their own ignorance toward understanding (my achievements/intelligence).

Conclusion:
There will be NO forgiveness for them. Their failure to moral character is entirely their OWN! As always, they take it with them to death!

Thus, end-note:
Norway should be remembered for this, having objected to intelligence, grand, and "set an upper limit to socially acceptable intelligence", but have no clue of personality gradient or the very consequences themselves. They're out of control and whining about it too!

Final: This is goodbye forever. There will be no forgiveness. The fault is ON THEM!

TAGS/NAILS: Ethics Law Religion History Norway Forgiveness Clinical pathology Mental Pathology Pathology of Schizophrenia .

Pro Death Sentence - To the politics of the World (Heh? Formerly deleted? Google?)

Arguments will enter here on a line, of course, respecting the opposition's absolutely best, the Abolitionists of the Death Sentence.

Main points: mental pathologies, stopping further mental pains/agony for the imprisoned, stopping "prison gamies", best line for victims/offenders aside, much crime in the World.

Not best presentation (even for blog), but here is:
The Case over the Death Sentence

That I cite the disagreement over the opposition to the death sentence for "non-principal" and that this has a specific reasoning.

Apart:
I also dispute that the UDHR article 3 or some, "The right to life" defends against the death penalty because the UDHR doesn't cover punishment for criminals (who truly deserve it).

Still, though, all matters regarded, according to Article 3 of UDHR, Amnesty Int. has the explicit duty to see the (European) populations armed with personal weaponry in light of highly criminal Europe, rife crime throughout Europe, even down to risking our "humanistic" fine line of peace (defeating Hitler, negotiating peace with Gandhi, other humanistic goals such as peace itself, under EU)!

A signal for approval of "carnivore mentalities" as the normative to society is no good either, rewarding the murderers with "extended life" and "possible jail-breaks (with a blind eye or not" while of course, the victim gets DEATH and the relatives (of a good person) loose an important person in their lives, with deep griefs to go, the beloved forever gone from their lives.

The Pro-Side for the Death Sentence Legislation

Mind you, being part of the pro-death side (humanistic and non-principal) in them, the murderers/"the torture to death"-murderers having removed from the surface of Earth 1 (eternal) human being, The Bible Law of Retribution (old testament), the opposition you will meet: mental pathologies, i.e., the people who behave maliciously no matter what with murders and the rest to go. Humanistic: with use of anasthetics (cocaine disallowed because of "mildness") to four electrically fired shots to heart and brain, prisoner to be seated, or guillotine (inside law and order, NOT rebellion, and meditated/by ruling, not headless, head down or side-ways, sharp guillotine blade and both guaranteeing instant death. Well, well, this is the start for you, this is our argument we ask you to consider... Also refer to legal systems today, with widespread crime (incl. torture, like strangulation/suffocation and murders, other, one way or other)
Conclusion: one should still consider the death penalty because holding up hate inside prison cell for more than 20 years most often, has no meaning!

The lying over the premises for the Abolition of the Death Sentences

1. That law and order is respected throughout the countries and if information allows it, problems have been dealt with - LIE!
2. The fact that the state does not kill is also a LIE because it does kill some people, and especially attack the young and exposed. That is, the state does kill by its corruption.
3. There have been promises over the health too, and one such promise has been over the performance of those who have had higher education, i.e., university and college. These people have been said to perform reasonably well given that behaviour has been a calm and orderly, decent clothing included or "up to one's best ability". - LIE!
4. There have also been descriptive problems throughout the legal systems and some people have considered the legal matters not possible to fit into a system at all. Given that these descriptive can get solved, the promise has been that progress would obtain likewise. LIE!
5. Even the mere corruption by police (incl. the lawyers) and medical doctors kill substantially, without much attention at all. The systems defends the killers and the LIEs!
6. We have been told that very insane people would be taken care of by the psychiatric hospitals and that insane people would be kept away from the general public, that the mental pathologies of people have been contained. LIE! (Rather they are propelled by various shoving (physical violence up to and including torture) and rewarding corruption and crime.)
7. A slight point on the contemporary "carnivore psychologies". That people have an inbuilt sense, the psychologists have claimed to kill and LIE about killing.

Conclusion: the state does kill by corruption and killers get away with it too, as the LIEs are defended more or less systematically.

Note: My latest efforts in presenting improvements for the legal systems throughout the World esp. by the 4 lie detectors used at once or not, along with the efforts of others, may turn these current problems entirely around.
Note2: The "carnivore psychologists" are about to suffer definite losses and are likely to disappear from the World if matters pick up.
Note3: It is Amnesty International (with references to Nazi-Germany and Cambodia and Red Khmer among others) which is most known for the "if the state starts killing people...", at least, they have picked up on the principle of a non-killing state for a very long time. One that I admit to having believed in, reading about Amensty Int. handbook of 144 pages or so, back in the early 90s or so.
Note4: An extra note is that the blatant police corruption (in Europe) makes it useful to use the military for 10 days in delivering as much pistols to the populations as necessary and that people with fears for handguns can abstain from collecting theirs and produce, possibly, a medical excuse for this (lack of personal weapon) later.

Message to our opposition directly. We hope they bother to discuss both sides during the arranged Congress in Madrid, Facebook representation https://www.facebook.com/Congresmondialpeinedemort , the message:

Dear ECPM

Mind you, being part of the pro-death side (humanistic and non-principal) in them, the murderers/"the torture to death"-murderers having removed from the surface of Earth 1 (eternal) human being, The Bible Law of Retribution (old testament), the opposition you will meet: mental pathologies, i.e., the people who behave maliciously no matter what with murders and the rest to go. Humanistic: with use of anasthetics (cocaine disallowed because of "mildness") to four electrically fired shots to heart and brain, prisoner to be seated, or guillotine (inside law and order, NOT rebellion, and meditated/by ruling, not headless, head down or side-ways, sharp guillotine blade and both guaranteeing instant death. Well, well, this is the start for you, this is our argument we ask you to consider... Also refer to legal systems today, with widespread crime (incl. torture, like strangulation/suffocation and murders, other, one way or other).

Conclusion: one should still consider the death penalty because holding up hate inside prison cell for more than 20 years most often, has no meaning!

Another message later:
A signal for approval of "carnivore mentalities" as the normative to society is no good either, rewarding the murderers with "extended life" and "possible jail-breaks (with a blind eye or not" while of course, the victim gets DEATH and the relatives (of a good person) loose an important person in their lives, with deep griefs to go, the beloved forever gone from their lives. (ECPM has duties to make information follow-up and inform members of the best arguments the opposition has!)

Sincerely yours,
Lenny F. Olsnes-Lea
(Norway)

ECPM - 5e Congrès Mondial / 5th World Congress / 5o Congreso Mundial

Some links to them so we make sure to update the discussion quickly, also evaluating the data-set: https://twitter.com/Abolition_2013 - CongrèsAbolition2013 (Abolition_2013) on Twitter
http://congres.abolition.fr/?lang=en - 5th World Congress against the Death Penalty - Together Against the Death Penalty (ECPM) on the internet.
Either way, we need to see to it that both sides fulfills the requirement to have its members by "informed consent".

I'm sorry that this looks a bit badly set up for now. My belief, however, is that there is surely more to add by criminal statistics and sociological data as well as some legal systems data from the courts, like frequencies of reduced sentences for serious offences, the murders, other cases of serious abuse and torture.

Identifying a New Human Rights Frontier Problem - Electrification

Wild speculations. Techified/electrified/electronic people, meaning full "bodied" implants of crime, criminal doctors (like Dr. Mengele), tech-administrated, tech-ears and tech-eyes, tech-neuro, spine and brain-threads, mobile-phone module implants with special recharging implants (all sodof*ck possible). The population of suspected "exploits"/exploits: 5 Mn. and growing fast! *evil-smiles*

S*tanic number enough! Public degradation evident! Human Rights next? Down the f*cking mud! "I hope you like it!" (And a "happy" new year!)

(And an enterprise opportunity too: "take over" Social Program accounts! Literally, become rich on Welfare money from the state to the non-existent clients they pay out to!) "First to Facebook as no rights to myself!"

"First to Facebook as no rights to myself!"

The Baltic Sea and Its History - Limestone to be added? - A Matter of Ecology

After WWF and various other "whistle blowers": But for "colleagial" exchange of information and some slight suspicions of something that can possibly be unturned:Concerning the Baltic sea and fish death: can it be that, on par with (synthetic) rubber production, that an unknown gasoline derivative (Xylitin? or some) has caused massive "unfruitful"/hostile conditions for fish to grow/find food there so that ALL attempts in restoring the fish banks of the Baltic Sea will fail? Xylitol is also a questioned substance of a derivative (sugar) kind that I don't want to enter the discussion of! Good luck with investigations! Have a nice day! (Remember that polluters are dishonest and possibly hideous people and that GREAT CARE needs to be displayed in order to approach this!)And for seriousness more, that I've taken the med. doctors of epidemiology/bacteriolology/hygiene for slight alcohol tendencies, whether on the black side or the alcoholism itself! Salicylic acids of antbacteria products! Good?

I do not yet say that this story will produce these or other successes, just that I note a possible investigative angle! Alright? (Don't expect me to "toss and turn" to answer you. I have scarce time on my hands and "a bit" to do.)

I guess I withdraw from the above, while leaving the suspicion "alive" for those who want to investigate possible scenarios. While certainly not "still water" in the extreme "brackish" water sense (hence the storms, given the surface area that the winds affect), there may very well be governing principles in nature that regulates the beings fit for fresh waters and salty waters, respectively. Thus, I think most may be looking into what can fit into this Baltic Sea in terms of sea life able to cope with the salinity and the weak currents that probably bring in very little oxygen and nutrition. So what about the Dartmouth "Vade" play in the World and the Shakespeare creatures introduction to USA? I (deeply) respect the research restraints on the Baltic Sea and I have no need for extremities. That we consider this in peace and "enjoy that pace of research" connected to the whole area!

Informed suspicions of those "alive":
Suspected insertion of "unknown/poisoning chemical substances". Time: 1985, appx.

Suspect of pollution: Denmark. (USA is cleared, I think.)

Result: Fish death, other bio-deaths, vast brackish water bodies, dead Baltic Seas.

Pollution chemical: Kerosene, a hydrocarbons product, other name is paraffin, used also for "oil-lamps".

The pollution from Denmark or of the shores of Denmark, but under Danish pollution authorities may have taken place by the organisation of foreigners, like foreigners from Norway and USA and that pollution has happened by "delivery" with a specially designed "robot" vehicle.
The Baltic Sea has once been famous for the Swedish Silver, the Swedish silver herring, from what I can recall.

Suggested confirmation price tag: 20 Mn SEK for mainly a basin, naturalised and filled with sea water by direct filling system.

Now what? Yes, also check pollution records for the Baltic Sea nations. Other? Get the confirmation started.

Given the current situation of the Baltic Sea, I can recommend a qualified loading of crushed limestone straight from nature into the Baltic Sea as primary way for neutralising "damaging" effects to the Sea's ecology.

A suspected report from Denmark, 25. Dec. 1984(?, date uncertain): "They dumped 25 tons of paraffin onto the ocean (Baltic Sea) floor to prove that fishes could die!!!" This goes to the suspicions above.

Note: url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baltic_Sea
Note2: First to Facebook profile, then to Facebook note "by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 03:21 CET."
Note3: Additional info over how any pollution may have taken place, i.e., by "robot" vehicle or other.

Note on CIA - The Charges... Separately from "Financial Radicalism"

Further on CIA and the charge against them for generating "simple psychologies": So, after "so much terrorism against itself", exactly, what is the "Anti-Terrorism" report of the CIA?

What is it's contents? And what are the official adversaries of USA in it? Do they manage to set up an organisation at all and does it have a country to reside in? I doubt it. Indeed, I think they are (in hiding) now setting up their own adversaries to excuse their own existence and the human rights violations they take part in for making it happen, a kind of "evil-advocacy".

They don't need to identify other countries' threats! That's not their job! But they are not to set up covert threats against other countries either. Their job is to protect the 50 states of USA, at least primarily, if not also American Samoa and a bit more.

So then, as a trait of the World today, not the destruction of the fishes' breeding grounds then under the sea, near the Gulf Stream center or "a nice" place in the Pacific or the other places where fishes breed? This is not a charge against CIA, but the real charge is that, by their flaws toward rules and regulations, by insanity too, they help bring on very negative events in the World that largely go unaddressed because the threats are fairly severe and under CIA, as a kind of monitored hostility, other countries fail to counter-act them! This is the message.

If not the lying on Iraq and its non-existant WMDs or the sacking of the Iraqi central bank or the first promise, that Iraq now after the Desert Storm and being ousted from Kuwait now was to reside inside "responsibility" because all was set up for this to happen now and for always, given modern possibilites, by sanctions, and ten other agreements to its sins against "Arab-brothers".

Concl.: CIA has to be disbanded, the organisation needs to go out of existence!

It started with US American Financial Radicalism and Warning! (I know, I'm so cool.) Alright. I just say it: My judgment is that

CIA IS SUBVERSION

and that the organisation has a culture of generating "simple psychologies"! Like it or not! I die on this! ("For today.")

You can also compare the number of agents, a mix of civilians and military vs. the British equiv. MI6 (Military Intelligence, Section 6) and how the British are careful in (not) mixing the civilian and military "considerations", by only a 20 people staff. The CIA has no such distinction and "blows away" all of its 20 000, regardless!

While we in Europe have believed in freedom and competition bewteeen the corporations and "entertained" the serious debate, they have moved the other way, many or all: CONTROL!

A fine point(é) against CIA is possibly this: given /their own/ notions over matters of human intelligence, purely they are to self-annihilate as organisation because their statement is of such kind that "no limit bla, bla, bla, ... that people are bound to being "this" forever!" Hurray for UN! To the future!

Under certain presuppositions, I have to the CIA:
◾Objective ethics
◾Religious beliefs logically defended and under telepathy and Van Lommel-studies too(otherwise, "the priests' stories")
◾My attacks on The Stranger by Camus over human nature now that they've been "shown to be...", i.e., the BIG intelligence competition and the Arab number
◾The findings by mSomatism are to be included here as well

Now that it turns out that /I/ was with the DeepBlue against Kasparov in a programmed computer defeat of him, i.e., the former references from Sweden also, I am all the more happy!

Not that I enter such slander but some have said that CIA has had a bit of "earth ants" mark on them in the past. Just as a remark put inside the Graham Norton show of Britain.

Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA !

(Not only their "earth ant" reputation from a field "down South" from New York, but also "much of their explicit behaviour from all other".)

Some symptoms from their neighbouring Princeton University: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45688354/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/can-ignorance-make-better-democracy-fish-it-can/#.UNT8n4MTlTK - Science story over fish-schools.
Url more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2102612,00.html - America Votes with the Fishes.
(Perhaps they are a bit slanderous. That we must respect that they build a standard reference database for these types of "animal-studies".)

End remark for now: I apologise that this presentation is lacking in firmness of disposition that I am "nowhere near studies by the library", given a dire personal situation in corruption-Norway.

The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.

With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"

Note: First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012. Note2: Today, I've tried to inform the ECtHR of serious problems in Norway relating to the formulation of the Breivik Pradox. I've tried to phone them by official number: 00 33388412018 and getting "this number is not in use" by NetCom mob.ph.-services.
Note3: The message to ECtHR has been (upon sending):
I'd like You to know about the Breivik Paradox and the very serious problems it offers in terms of legal practice with a police force already marked by corruption and now is looking for individuals, "whether they remember it or not", traumatic experiences can /easily/ disappear from memory! Here:
The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture
by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.
With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"
(Note: under the message to ECtHR) First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012.
So this should be it.

One Question for UN Secretary General and Everyone Else, Whole World, Whomever...

What is the moral negative value on each and every instance of torture, starting with the mildest level, the water-boarding (gosh, that is so evil!) equivalents, including hanging a person slowly, until unconscious, again and again, until death, this also concerns the sex-games of lunatics ending in the murder of unknowing, innocent people and ALL in reality count!!!?

They say there is no torture, but for real, torture and fear is everywhere!!!

Go ahead and see if you can ignore it?
Can we have the "quants" in too so as to present a credible number?! In order to quantify the negative moral value of torture toward the larger picture of World morality...

Norway is Hereby Disputed (if not for only entertaining the thought, that academic mark!)

When a country insists on corruption and decadence, to be polite, effectively practicing "Modern Despotism", i.e., the rule of raw and brutal power, what are then the (real) value of its borders? Aren't the borders then gone? And given some more factors to and from, bribes and other (packs of whatever cargo content), aren't they thereby impossible to hold with any credibility whatsoever?

And yes, please, send this to your Faculty of Law, any Norwegians out there..., please! Heh-heh-heh, yes, you can choose any...!!! ;-)