The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture
by Leonardo F.
Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.
With Breivik, it may have
proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide
themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do
we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to
think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a
legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that
has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place,
BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST
ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN",
(muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for
that...?"
Note: First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public
setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012. Note2: Today, I've tried to inform the
ECtHR of serious problems in Norway relating to the formulation of the
Breivik Pradox. I've tried to phone them by official number: 00 33388412018 and
getting "this number is not in use" by NetCom mob.ph.-services.
Note3: The
message to ECtHR has been (upon sending):
I'd like You to know about the
Breivik Paradox and the very serious problems it offers in terms of legal
practice with a police force already marked by corruption and now is looking for
individuals, "whether they remember it or not", traumatic experiences can
/easily/ disappear from memory! Here:
The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems -
On the Use of Torture
by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at
20:02 CEST.
With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to
charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture.
Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this
terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry
for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a
strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or
blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T
USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM
EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps,
more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"
(Note:
under the message to ECtHR) First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile
(by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012.
So this should be it.
Monday, 24 September 2012
Friday, 14 September 2012
One Question for UN Secretary General and Everyone Else, Whole World, Whomever...
What is the moral negative value on each and every instance of torture, starting with the
mildest level, the water-boarding (gosh, that is so evil!) equivalents,
including hanging a person slowly, until unconscious, again and again, until
death, this also concerns the sex-games of lunatics ending in the murder of
unknowing, innocent people and ALL in reality count!!!?
They say there is no torture, but for real, torture and fear is everywhere!!!
Go ahead and see if you can ignore it?
Can we have the "quants" in too so as to present a credible number?! In order to quantify the negative moral value of torture toward the larger picture of World morality...
They say there is no torture, but for real, torture and fear is everywhere!!!
Go ahead and see if you can ignore it?
Can we have the "quants" in too so as to present a credible number?! In order to quantify the negative moral value of torture toward the larger picture of World morality...
Norway is Hereby Disputed (if not for only entertaining the thought, that academic mark!)
When a country insists on corruption and decadence, to be polite, effectively practicing "Modern Despotism", i.e., the rule of raw and brutal power, what are then the (real) value of its borders? Aren't the borders then gone? And given some more factors to and from, bribes and other (packs of whatever cargo content), aren't they thereby impossible to hold with any credibility whatsoever?
And yes, please, send this to your Faculty of Law, any Norwegians out there..., please! Heh-heh-heh, yes, you can choose any...!!! ;-)
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Over the Wikipedia Editorial Team and (Assisted) Suicide
When Wikipedia editorial teams stop information of this kind, they do something awful to the World:
Background for the Intellectual Defence
The intellectual defence for the pro-assisted suicide side is: to be serious toward people who want the possibility to die because they suffer the most grievous pains. Now, after paying empathy to these people in pain, there are some common points like what possible hidden motives can the pro-side possibly have? Are we not supposed to be real about pain and therefore people in pain? Isn't a very painful life awful? And the arguments continue for the pro-side on this note, all very plausible and direct. So, who is the opposition? Who are they? Let's see! One list of arguments can be found here: http://philosophyblog777.blogspot.no/2012/06/assisted-suicide-final-argument-pro.html[50].(The rest is coming...)
Troubles in the World: Fx. the Wikipedia article of "Assisted suicide" FAILS to include basic information such as "The intellectual defence for the pro-assisted suicide side is: to be serious toward people who want the possibility to die because they suffer the most grievous pains. Now, after paying empathy to these people in pain, there are some common points like what possible hidden motives can the pro-side possibly have? Are we not supposed to be real about pain and therefore people in pain? Isn't a very painful life awful? And the arguments continue for the pro-side on this note, all very plausible and direct. So, who is the opposition? Who are they? Let's see!" Even if the body text has been placed under "Defence for Legalising Assisted Suicide", same thing happens! Now, if these people act under malicious intent, simply for securing the "existence of torture", then damnation on them, because that is to be evil in the hardest sense you can find on Planet Earth (and all attached to it)! Guns up, people! There's going to be trouble more! Cheers!
The very link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_suicide !
I've also added the above under a different header without success!
There is a note more to consider, for ending this, and it is:
The implausible slippery slope argument from the opposition is this,
- the "Slippery Slope" defeats itself (by fake ethics) by protecting hugely crazy people who have absolutely no problems accepting the devastation brought by it on human dignity and human worth/decency and how torture inflicts terror and deep fears, even sublimely, on the rest of the population.
- secondly, and more directly, the Slippery Slope never accounts for formal qualification, while citing this Nazi program "so seriously", "as if their whole bodies would be immersed", such as obtaining 3-year therapy after the age of 18 before getting the approval for suicide!
- "The Slippery Slope", in addition, has no concept or credible prediction for how many people Slippery Slope will affect outside those already, virtually, queued in! When 36 000 people die from guns (or gun deaths) in USA every year, would the rest of USA therefore get killed by guns next year? NO! Why is this? Because troubles need to obtain in certain ways first! This has a direct analogy to legislated suicides in that this counters the very Slippery Slope argument and the way these disgusting people (complex, as with traits of psychopathy and mis-a/-ophiles) remain active in society, "defending humanity" still! There is no doubt where I want: (Assisted) Suicides need legal defence/legislation and practice urgently so that people can achieve greater respect and have the possibility to escape the great horrors of the World today, thus moving the World up one step in terms of dignity and worth.
Note1: As people enter the academic discussion, they inherently commit to honesty!
Note2: They can call themselves doctors or whatever! They have been defeated! (That is, they're not "born" with credibility.)
So, surely, suicide remains controversial, not to say the fishes on wanting people's tails, and I ask you therefore to take CARE and put much attention toward personal security (as a warning sign by the behaviour shown above)! Cheers!
Background for the Intellectual Defence
The intellectual defence for the pro-assisted suicide side is: to be serious toward people who want the possibility to die because they suffer the most grievous pains. Now, after paying empathy to these people in pain, there are some common points like what possible hidden motives can the pro-side possibly have? Are we not supposed to be real about pain and therefore people in pain? Isn't a very painful life awful? And the arguments continue for the pro-side on this note, all very plausible and direct. So, who is the opposition? Who are they? Let's see! One list of arguments can be found here: http://philosophyblog777.blogspot.no/2012/06/assisted-suicide-final-argument-pro.html[50].(The rest is coming...)
Troubles in the World: Fx. the Wikipedia article of "Assisted suicide" FAILS to include basic information such as "The intellectual defence for the pro-assisted suicide side is: to be serious toward people who want the possibility to die because they suffer the most grievous pains. Now, after paying empathy to these people in pain, there are some common points like what possible hidden motives can the pro-side possibly have? Are we not supposed to be real about pain and therefore people in pain? Isn't a very painful life awful? And the arguments continue for the pro-side on this note, all very plausible and direct. So, who is the opposition? Who are they? Let's see!" Even if the body text has been placed under "Defence for Legalising Assisted Suicide", same thing happens! Now, if these people act under malicious intent, simply for securing the "existence of torture", then damnation on them, because that is to be evil in the hardest sense you can find on Planet Earth (and all attached to it)! Guns up, people! There's going to be trouble more! Cheers!
The very link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_suicide !
I've also added the above under a different header without success!
There is a note more to consider, for ending this, and it is:
The implausible slippery slope argument from the opposition is this,
- the "Slippery Slope" defeats itself (by fake ethics) by protecting hugely crazy people who have absolutely no problems accepting the devastation brought by it on human dignity and human worth/decency and how torture inflicts terror and deep fears, even sublimely, on the rest of the population.
- secondly, and more directly, the Slippery Slope never accounts for formal qualification, while citing this Nazi program "so seriously", "as if their whole bodies would be immersed", such as obtaining 3-year therapy after the age of 18 before getting the approval for suicide!
- "The Slippery Slope", in addition, has no concept or credible prediction for how many people Slippery Slope will affect outside those already, virtually, queued in! When 36 000 people die from guns (or gun deaths) in USA every year, would the rest of USA therefore get killed by guns next year? NO! Why is this? Because troubles need to obtain in certain ways first! This has a direct analogy to legislated suicides in that this counters the very Slippery Slope argument and the way these disgusting people (complex, as with traits of psychopathy and mis-a/-ophiles) remain active in society, "defending humanity" still! There is no doubt where I want: (Assisted) Suicides need legal defence/legislation and practice urgently so that people can achieve greater respect and have the possibility to escape the great horrors of the World today, thus moving the World up one step in terms of dignity and worth.
Note1: As people enter the academic discussion, they inherently commit to honesty!
Note2: They can call themselves doctors or whatever! They have been defeated! (That is, they're not "born" with credibility.)
So, surely, suicide remains controversial, not to say the fishes on wanting people's tails, and I ask you therefore to take CARE and put much attention toward personal security (as a warning sign by the behaviour shown above)! Cheers!
Monday, 11 June 2012
My Very Last Letter to the Bar Associaton for Norwegian Lawyers, Advokatforeningen
I can't bear to get this translated now because of the heavy nature of the matters here being communicated over. You will have to use a translator, fx. Google Translate. Here:
Message-ID: <4FCFCD95.5050903@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 23:37:25 +0200
From: "Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea" <terjelea@gmail.com> [This email has been consequently used throughout my correspondance with "Advokatforeningen". I have also sent all former letters to "Advokatforeningen" to secure correspondance that has also been sent by (physical) mail because of the legal standards and lawyer's work!]
To: post@advokatforeningen.no [This is the email account from their official website.]
Subject: Orientering om deres/Deres beslutning om å la meg _bli offer_ for 1.2 vs. 3.3.1 som jeg mener å ha krav på
Hei dere i Advokatforeningen
Jeg vil med dette orientere dere om de alvorlige konsekvenser beslutningene fra Disiplinær-utvalgene har for mitt liv og hvilket dårlig eksempel dette gir i forhold til samfunnnet.
Fra YouTube, videoen er satt til "Offentlig"(!!!):http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7SkzfTMjG8&lr=1&feature=results_video
med overskriften, "Violation of human rights by Norway - Proof!".
Det er hevet over enhver tvil om at dere med disse beslutninger fra disse 3 sakene har sterkt begrenset mine muligheter som borger av Norge. Jeg mener også det er hevet over enhver tvil om at dere med dette har påført meg betydelige mentale byrder ved å implisere "at jeg er et vesen som ikke kan kalle meg menneske og som ikke har noen rettigheter"!!! Jeg vil si at dette er det nærmeste man kommer offentlig henrettelse i Norge (og det i et land uten dødsstraff)!
Denne prosessen har vært forferdelig tung å bære og jeg gjør med dette
Advokatforeningen uttrykkelig oppmerksom på nettopp dette!
Dere vet hva dere gjør!
Med vennlig hilsen
Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea
(Juridisk navn: Terje Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea
etter navneskifte fra Terje Lea)
PS: Innholdet av denne epost kan bli offentliggjort i sin helhet!
I Call for the Attention to These Cases as a Matter of Norwegian Legal Practice
The cases are these, first written to Facebook and then added some information:
Marianne Rugaas Knudsen-case (possible forensic police murderer) 28 Aug 1981,
the Birgitte Tengs-case, 1995, spring, in May, Easter holiday,
the Ulf Karlsen-case 1999, winter, February(?),
Kristin Juel Johannessen-case (failure of judgment on genetics), 1999, August,
and finally
Therese Johannessen (Fjell, Drammen, allegedly Thomas Quick, but all sorts of mistakes and faulty towers people), 3 July 1988! For the Therese Johannessen-case, please consider these names, Dag Sandnes, Olaf Sandnes, Tone Hapnes, Svein Arne Hapnes and that they finally should be "10" in the set-up altogether, withdrawing one name, possibly.
Good hunting!
Seondarily, please consider these pathological traits by these cases, 3:
1. 1988 as top year for suicides, 1 legal system - Nein - Heil Hitler
2. The alleged sabotage and criminal operation against Scandinavian Star, settting the ship alight and killing a larger number of people, the biggest number of victims in modern history of the cruise fare business, going from and to Oslo - Copenhagen
3. Also the inquiry to whether "forces" in Norway has been sponsoring the Srebrenica massacre/genocide in the wake of close cultural ties with Serbia, where a larger number of Serbs have been learning Norwegian, Norway being a lucrative prospect in having a growing wealth because of its petroleum industry
Marianne Rugaas Knudsen-case (possible forensic police murderer) 28 Aug 1981,
the Birgitte Tengs-case, 1995, spring, in May, Easter holiday,
the Ulf Karlsen-case 1999, winter, February(?),
Kristin Juel Johannessen-case (failure of judgment on genetics), 1999, August,
and finally
Therese Johannessen (Fjell, Drammen, allegedly Thomas Quick, but all sorts of mistakes and faulty towers people), 3 July 1988! For the Therese Johannessen-case, please consider these names, Dag Sandnes, Olaf Sandnes, Tone Hapnes, Svein Arne Hapnes and that they finally should be "10" in the set-up altogether, withdrawing one name, possibly.
Good hunting!
Seondarily, please consider these pathological traits by these cases, 3:
1. 1988 as top year for suicides, 1 legal system - Nein - Heil Hitler
2. The alleged sabotage and criminal operation against Scandinavian Star, settting the ship alight and killing a larger number of people, the biggest number of victims in modern history of the cruise fare business, going from and to Oslo - Copenhagen
3. Also the inquiry to whether "forces" in Norway has been sponsoring the Srebrenica massacre/genocide in the wake of close cultural ties with Serbia, where a larger number of Serbs have been learning Norwegian, Norway being a lucrative prospect in having a growing wealth because of its petroleum industry
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Formal Declaration as Victor over State of Norway
As a political victim and being persecuted by State of Norway, now
and undeniably (subverting my relocation to some place abroad and other), I
declare victory over State of Norway given my many achievements in the World of
Intellectuality, forcing them backward to eventually saying "...but we have the
physical forces to dominate your livelihood and to cause your death", depriving
me of my natural life, effectively, confirming my status now as political
dissident of Norway, being Pro-Democratic Activist!
This follows the given logic of this: victor, victor, victor, victor, finally victim and death, by torture or not, medically aided or not!!! Thus, history is likely to tell my story of being victor despite a possible death as victim, with or without being able to "escape" abroad!
There are hundreds of implications of this, all of which should have been embarrassing or deeply embarrassing to the State of Norway, but given this awful, political climate, such utterances have become impossible, displaying a evident idiot condition of a finally idiot nation that has lost all its values, all of its causes!!!
As I've now won the Intelligence war of the World, with many feats such as the historical account of "Hindenburg-New-York", I finally say too: I've won (again), idiots! Thus, of course, I can refer to the heading and the point of this text.
I'm sorry for presenting such an account for this nation and it has not been a part of my ideas and the leadership that I've wanted and for those sensitive enough, I place myself in disappointment and grief with them! Thanks for now!
This follows the given logic of this: victor, victor, victor, victor, finally victim and death, by torture or not, medically aided or not!!! Thus, history is likely to tell my story of being victor despite a possible death as victim, with or without being able to "escape" abroad!
There are hundreds of implications of this, all of which should have been embarrassing or deeply embarrassing to the State of Norway, but given this awful, political climate, such utterances have become impossible, displaying a evident idiot condition of a finally idiot nation that has lost all its values, all of its causes!!!
As I've now won the Intelligence war of the World, with many feats such as the historical account of "Hindenburg-New-York", I finally say too: I've won (again), idiots! Thus, of course, I can refer to the heading and the point of this text.
I'm sorry for presenting such an account for this nation and it has not been a part of my ideas and the leadership that I've wanted and for those sensitive enough, I place myself in disappointment and grief with them! Thanks for now!
My Account toward The Bar Association for Norwegian Lawyers - Advokatforeningen
Remark, therefore: only in Norwegian for now!
Thursday, 10 May 2012
The Stairs and Fan-Theory over the Corrupt Factors of Society
First, this is notified you so that society has a chance to progress AWAY from tacitly being forced to accept the torture of people "here and there", and most grotesquely the children, even in the "bottle"-sense (you can make this description better... ehm... *cough* *cough*)!
So here is the description of the risk factors to look up for in the stairs and fan sense:
1. step: The Police, they are central and they know it! This is why it is now very important to get all people all over the World equipped with a gun so that merit can obtain where it should and not under some idiot threat without being *MET*!!!
2. step: The lawyers. A good deal of them actually work in the police forces and all of them are bosses on some level _in the very police forces_! You should see to it that they are checked upon as well!
3. step: The _medical_ doctors! They are too a significant factor and of course stand on the assessment side of what takes place in society when people are under stress! Of course they know what is going!
The Fan floor: All these other people, starting with the most important people who are in the brain business and who has positions of responsibility!
Uknown factor: I don't know how the military forces match up in this. This is a factor that may go here and there, both in terms of equipment and competence/skills!
Make sure you take care of these "risk factors of corruption" and make preparations toward your contribution to society, please! Good luck!
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
Legal Matters Concerning Suicides and Committing the Suicide
Now, let me tell you (a version, at least) of how easy I imagine it is (for some) suicide candidates (whether I am one or not is mutti-f*cking PRIVATE and I do not need "clarification advise from /this/ friend (psychologist)"): first, being invisible enough, and not being persecuted by a body of people, all included, with or w/o military/police resources and competence. So there you go... Some peo...ple spit at you and tell you to die, that is, to suicide... Yes, that is easy, given this "body of people", persecuting you (on informal level, of course, and "let's not forget the paranoid factors involved") by radio hunting these placed RFIDs by mini-surgery (while sedated, covertly or not) or placing the words around that movements on this person by information is wanted so that, you know, they blow the very (fragile and deeply personal) privacy of this person, making one's VERY PRIVATE considerations over chances, where these idiots sit there and "clip" the button for turning this consideration of this person falsely, so that this person can imagine that one falls prey to torture regardless or that the suicide is made under false premises, being wholly psychological (by these telepathic connections and under possible threat and danger of severe hospital torture! And YES, it's TRUE, this person is to carry out these considerations PRIVATELY and YOU HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM!!! The very question is (well f*cked out of your consideration) only this person's own and evidently so, this person is always objective in this consideration and the only valid judge on one very own matter whether suicide is right or wrong!!! I hope you GET THIS, please!!! Being a victim in these circumstances is not easy and these f*cks ("#¤%¤%Y%&(&"¤&%&(%&&"#¤%, and the rest of the "99 swearing words") are equally despicable and subject to one's own criminal conscience of trying to wage such f*ck toward people, blatantly violating _fundamental_ human rights!!! Bye for now! [If I need support in critical terms? Maybe... Is it so hard for Amnesty Int. to "lift a poster"?!!!]
Note: First written to Facebook and another place here on this blog 27. April, 2012!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)